Legal Realism

In legal philosophy, few theories have sparked as much debate and scrutiny as legal positivism. Rooted in the works of influential thinkers such as Jeremy Bentham, John Austin, and HLA Hart, legal positivism has left an indelible mark on our understanding of law and its relationship to morality. This article aims to elucidate the core principles of legal positivism, exploring its origins, key tenets, criticisms, and contemporary relevance.

Legal positivism emerged in the 19th century as a response to earlier natural law theories, which posited that the validity of law derived from moral principles inherent in the natural order. Contrary to natural law theorists, legal positivists argued that law should be understood as a social phenomenon, divorced from moral considerations. Jeremy Bentham and John Austin are often credited as the founding fathers of legal positivism, laying the groundwork for subsequent developments in the field.

Perhaps the most distinctive feature of legal positivism is its insistence on separating law from morality. According to legal positivists, the validity of law is not contingent upon its moral content or conformity to ethical principles. Instead, law is defined by its source, such as legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or recognised legal authorities within a given legal system.

Legal positivism emphasises the importance of social sources in determining the validity of legal norms. These sources include statutes, constitutions, judicial precedents, and other institutionalised practices within a legal system. The legitimacy of law is derived from its recognition and acceptance by relevant social institutions, rather than its moral or ethical content.

HLA Hart introduced the concept of the rule of recognition to explain how legal systems determine the validity of legal norms. The rule of recognition serves as a master rule that identifies the criteria for identifying valid laws within a particular legal system. It specifies the sources and procedures that legal officials must follow to create, interpret, and apply legal rules.

Legal positivism draws a clear distinction between legal validity and moral validity. While a law may be legally valid if it conforms to the rules and procedures established by the relevant legal system, it does not necessarily possess moral validity. Legal positivists argue that legal validity does not depend on moral considerations, and morally unjust laws can still be legally valid if they meet the formal criteria of the rule of recognition.

Despite its prominence in legal philosophy, legal positivism has faced criticism from various quarters. Critics argue that legal positivism's strict separation of law and morality overlooks the moral dimension of law and fails to account for the inherent moral content of legal norms. Additionally, opponents contend that legal positivism's focus on social sources neglects the role of moral principles in shaping legal systems and guiding legal decision-making.

In contemporary legal scholarship, legal positivism continues to be a subject of debate and inquiry. While some scholars advocate for a revival of legal positivism, emphasising its analytical clarity and empirical focus, others challenge its foundational assumptions and seek to reconcile law with morality through alternative theories such as inclusive legal positivism or legal interpretivism.

In conclusion, legal positivism stands as one of the most influential theories in legal philosophy, offering a distinct perspective on the nature of law and its relationship to morality. Despite its criticisms and controversies, legal positivism has shaped our understanding of law in profound ways, providing valuable insights into the social, institutional, and normative dimensions of legal systems. As legal scholars continue to grapple with the complexities of law and morality, the legacy of legal positivism remains a rich and fertile ground for intellectual inquiry and exploration.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.