M v Home Office [1993]

M v Home Office [1993] UKHL is a significant UK constitutional law case establishing that the courts have the power to enforce the law against the Crown and its ministers through the grant of injunctions, and that ministers are not immune from contempt of court.

The facts of the case involved M, a citizen of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo), who sought asylum in the UK. Despite repeated rejections of his asylum applications and applications for judicial review, a misunderstanding arose when the judge mistakenly believed that counsel for the Secretary of State had given an undertaking to postpone M's removal from the UK pending consideration of his latest application. Consequently, M was not disembarked from his flight back to Zaire. Upon learning of M's wrongful deportation, the judge issued an injunction order for his return. In response, the Secretary of State, believing that M's asylum application was rightfully rejected, sought to set aside the judge's injunction order and cancel M's return.

The Court of Appeal held Kenneth Baker, the Home Secretary, in contempt of court for failing to comply with the injunction order. Nolan LJ ruled that the teacher must be returned. He emphasised the proper constitutional relationship between the executive and the courts, asserting that the courts will respect all acts of the executive within its lawful boundaries, and the executive, in turn, will respect the decisions of the courts regarding its lawful authority.

On further appeal, the House of Lords ruled that the Home Secretary acted in contempt of court and mandated the return of the teacher. Lord Templeman expressed that the courts possess coercive powers, exercisable in contempt of court proceedings, for the purpose of enforcing the law against all individuals and institutions. He rejected the argument that there is no power to enforce the law against a minister in his official capacity, stating that such a notion would imply that the executive obeys the law as a matter of grace, not necessity.

Lord Templeman acknowledged that judges cannot enforce the law against the Crown as Monarch, given the legal principle that the Crown as Monarch can do no wrong. However, the courts can enforce the law against the Crown as an executive entity and against individuals representing the Crown. Therefore, injunctions and contempt proceedings can be brought against a minister in his official capacity. In this case, the Home Secretary was found in contempt while acting in his official capacity.

While acknowledging that the Home Secretary acted under advice he was entitled to accept and with a mistaken view of the law, Lord Templeman clarified that Kenneth Baker, personally, was not deemed guilty of contempt. The appeal was dismissed, substituting the Secretary of State for Home Affairs as the individual against whom the finding of contempt was made.

Lord Woolf provided legal grounding, referencing Section 31(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981. This statutory provision grants the court jurisdiction to issue injunctions against ministers and other representatives of the Crown. While acknowledging that contempt proceedings are typically personal and punitive, he emphasised their necessity in specific circumstances to safeguard the court's orders.

This case stands as a poignant illustration of the principle of equality under the law—a fundamental tenet of the rule of law. The coercive power vested in the courts is highlighted as indispensable, enabling the judiciary to fulfil its constitutional duty of preventing the abuse of executive power. The ruling sets a precedent, emphasising accountability even at the highest levels of government.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.