Malory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes (UK) Ltd [2002]

Malory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes (UK) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 151 is an English land law case concerning the interpretation of the Land Registration Act 1925 and the concept of actual occupation in the context of overriding interests. The central issue revolved around the interpretation of Section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925, which states that the interest of a person in occupation overrides any registered disposition of land.

A company dishonestly obtained a land certificate for a piece of land from the Land Registry and sold it to Cheshire Homes, the defendants, who were registered as the new proprietors. The land included a derelict block of flats that the original owner used for storage. The original owner of the land, Malory Enterprises, the claimants, had taken measures to secure the property, such as erecting fences, boarding up windows, and keeping the building locked. When Cheshire Homes partially demolished the property, Malory Enterprises sought rectification of the Register and damages for trespass.

The trial judge ruled in favour of Malory Enterprises. Cheshire Homes appealed, arguing that Malory Enterprises had no overriding interest under Section 82(3) of the 1925 Act. Cheshire Homes contended that the right to seek rectification was discretionary and not a legal or equitable interest, asserting that Malory Enterprises had no interest in the land but merely the hope of recovering something they had lost.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It held that the discretionary nature of the right to seek rectification under Section 82(3) of the 1925 Act did not preclude Malory Enterprises from having an overriding interest. The key factor was that the claimants were in actual occupation of the property. The court clarified that in cases where a property was uninhabitable, residence was not required for actual occupation. However, some physical presence with a degree of permanence and continuity was necessary. In this case, the Malory Enterprises' actions in securing and using the property for storage constituted actual occupation, and their overriding interest bound the defendants.

This case underscores the significance of actual occupation as a factor in determining overriding interests, even when the right to seek rectification is discretionary under the Land Registration Act 1925.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.