McLoughlin v O'Brian [1983]

McLoughlin v O'Brian [1983] 1 AC 410 is a landmark English tort law case decided by the House of Lords, addressing the recoverability of damages for psychiatric harm suffered due to an accident involving a claimant's family.

On 19 October 1973, the claimant, Mrs McLoughlin, was informed by a friend two hours after a serious accident that her husband and three children had been involved. She was driven to the hospital, where she learned that one of her children had died and saw her husband and two other children severely injured, covered in oil and mud. This experience caused Mrs McLoughlin to suffer severe nervous shock, including clinical depression and personality changes. She subsequently sued the defendant, who was responsible for the accident.

This case was unique at the time as it extended the possibility of recovering damages for psychiatric harm beyond the immediate scene of the accident and beyond the time of its occurrence. Historically, English courts had allowed claimants to recover damages for psychiatric injuries only when they were present at the scene and witnessed the peril of a loved one. The legal novelty of this case made it a frequent subject of analysis by law students and legal philosophers, including Ronald Dworkin, who explored it hypothetically in his book Law's Empire.

At trial, the judge ruled in favour of Mrs McLoughlin, finding that the defendants owed her a duty of care as her psychiatric injury was a foreseeable result of witnessing her family's traumatic condition in the hospital. However, the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, citing public policy concerns. While the Court acknowledged the foreseeability of her injury and the existence of a duty of care, it held that allowing recovery in this context would overly extend liability. Lord Justice Stephenson reasoned that the breach's consequences should be limited for policy reasons, while Lord Justice Griffiths argued that the defendants' duty of care should apply only to those directly affected at the accident scene. The Court of Appeal suggested that any extension of liability should be left to legislative action.

The House of Lords ultimately reversed the Court of Appeal's decision and ruled in favour of Mrs McLoughlin. Lord Wilberforce delivered the leading judgment, outlining a three-part test for recovering damages for psychiatric harm. First, there must be a close familial relationship between the claimant and the accident victim, excluding ordinary bystanders. Second, the claimant must be in close proximity to the accident in terms of time and place, which includes witnessing the immediate aftermath of the event. Third, the claimant's psychiatric harm must result from direct perception of the event or its immediate aftermath, whether through sight or hearing. Lord Wilberforce and Lord Scarman both referenced the influence of the American case Dillon v Legg [1968] in shaping their reasoning.

The judgment reaffirmed that foreseeability of psychiatric harm and a claimant's close connection to the incident could justify imposing liability, even in the absence of the claimant's physical presence at the accident scene. It also emphasised that public policy concerns should not obstruct justice for claimants who meet the established criteria. This decision significantly shaped the development of English tort law regarding claims for psychiatric harm, balancing the principles of foreseeability, proximity, and fairness.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.