Miller II [2019]

R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41, commonly referred to as Miller II or Miller/Cherry, were joint landmark constitutional law cases on the limits of the power of royal prerogative used by the Government to prorogue the Parliament.

R (Miller) v The Prime Minister [2019]
In August 2019, Prime Minister Boris Johnson advised Queen Elizabeth II to prorogue (suspend) the UK Parliament for five weeks leading up to the Brexit deadline on October 31, 2019. The Prime Minister argued that this was a routine and lawful prorogation to prepare for a new parliamentary session. However, critics, including Gina Miller, a businesswoman and anti-Brexit campaigner, argued that the real purpose of proroguing Parliament was to limit its ability to scrutinise the government's Brexit plans or to prevent it from interfering with a no-deal Brexit.

The case was brought to the UK Supreme Court, which issued a unanimous judgment on September 24, 2019. The court ruled that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful because it had an extreme effect upon the fundamentals of democracy, and the Prime Minister's advice to the Queen was unlawful, void, and of no effect. Parliament was therefore not prorogued, and it was for Parliament to decide when it should sit again. This decision was seen as a significant legal and political development in the ongoing Brexit process.

Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019]
The Cherry case, often considered alongside the Miller case, was a related legal challenge in Scotland. A group of parliamentarians led by Joanna Cherry, a Member of Parliament from the Scottish National Party, challenged the prorogation of Parliament in the Scottish courts. The Court of Session in Scotland ruled that the prorogation was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification.

The case was also appealed to the UK Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court issued its unanimous judgment on the same day as the Miller case. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the Court of Session in Scotland, concluding that the Prime Minister's advice to the Queen was unlawful, void, and of no effect. This decision aligned with the ruling in the Miller case and contributed to the broader legal and political discussions surrounding the prorogation of Parliament and its impact on the Brexit process.

These cases were significant because they clarified the limits on the Prime Minister's authority to prorogue Parliament and reaffirmed the principle that parliamentary sovereignty is a fundamental aspect of the UK's constitutional framework. The rulings were seen as a check on executive power and had a profound impact on the Brexit process and UK politics at the time.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.