Ministerial Responsibility

The principle of ministerial responsibility, also known as ministerial accountability, is a fundamental concept in the British constitutional system, which holds that ministers are accountable to Parliament for the actions and decisions of their departments and agencies. This principle is based on the idea that ministers exercise powers and functions on behalf of the Crown, and are therefore responsible for ensuring that those powers and functions are exercised lawfully and in the public interest.

Under the principle of ministerial responsibility, ministers are required to answer to Parliament for the policies, decisions, and actions of their departments and agencies. This includes answering questions in Parliament, providing explanations for their decisions, and being held accountable for any mistakes or failures within their departments. Specifically, this doctrine encompasses the following concepts:

Individual ministerial responsibility: Individual ministerial responsibility holds ministers personally accountable for the actions and policies of their departments. Ministers are responsible for the conduct and performance of their staff and must take ownership of any errors, misconduct, or policy failures that occur within their portfolios. If a serious failure or mistake happens, ministers are expected to accept responsibility and may face consequences, such as resigning from their position.

Collective ministerial responsibility: Collective ministerial responsibility emphasises that ministers are collectively responsible for the decisions and policies of the government as a whole. It means that ministers must publicly support and defend government policies, even if they personally disagree with them. This principle ensures a united front in government decision-making and helps maintain cohesion and consistency in policy implementation. If a minister cannot support a policy, they are generally expected to resign from the government.

Resignation: In cases where a minister's actions or decisions are deemed to be improper, unethical, or have significant negative consequences, they may be required to resign from their position. Resignation is a means of accepting personal accountability and acknowledging that one's actions or decisions have compromised the government's credibility or integrity. Resignations can be triggered by public pressure, parliamentary scrutiny, or at the request of the Prime Minister.

Consequences and scrutiny: Ministers are subject to scrutiny from both Parliament and the public. Members of Parliament have the authority to question ministers on their policies, actions, and decisions during parliamentary debates and committee hearings. This scrutiny helps ensure that ministers are accountable to the legislature and that their conduct is transparent. Media scrutiny and public opinion also play a role in holding ministers accountable, as public pressure can lead to resignations or political repercussions.

The principle of ministerial responsibility is closely linked to the doctrine of parliamentary accountability, which holds that the government is accountable to Parliament for its actions and decisions. Together, these principles serve to ensure that the government is held to account for its actions and operates in a transparent and accountable manner.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.