National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981]

National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981]

National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981] AC 675 revolved around the applicability of the doctrine of frustration to lease contracts. The case also delved into the theoretical foundations of frustration, particularly endorsing the construction theory articulated by Lord Radcliffe in Davis v Fareham UDC [1956]. The case confirmed that while a lease involves a proprietary interest in land, it is also a contract, subject to ordinary contractual principles.

The facts of the case involved a 10-year lease for a warehouse that became unusable for a period of 10 months due to a street closure. In response, the tenant withheld rent, prompting the landlord to sue for the withheld rent. The tenant contended that the lease had been frustrated.

The House of Lords acknowledged that frustration, in principle, could apply to lease contracts. However, in this specific instance, the court ruled that the lease had not been frustrated. Lord Wilberforce, in his analysis, emphasised that the creation of an estate in land does not preclude the application of the frustration doctrine. He highlighted that express terms in a lease could dictate its termination under specific events, including those leading to frustration. Lord Wilberforce underscored that a lease serves as a means to an end, and if the mutually contemplated purpose of the lease is frustrated, termination may be justified. Nevertheless, in the current case, the loss of occupation for 10 months out of 10 years was deemed insufficient to constitute frustration.

However, Lord Russell dissented from the majority opinion, asserting that the doctrine of frustration should not extend to leases. He argued that land, unlike chattels, is indestructible, and the risk of unsuitability lies with the tenant unless the landlord provides a warranty. Lord Russell questioned the justice of returning a useless site to the lessor rather than allowing it to remain the property of the lessee.

Lord Hailsham, in his contribution, discussed five competing theories for the basis of frustration. He favoured the construction theory, as formulated by Lord Radcliffe in Davis v Fareham UDC. According to this theory, frustration occurs when a contractual obligation becomes incapable of being performed due to circumstances rendering it radically different from the contract's initial undertaking.

Lord Roskill concurred with Lord Hailsham, supporting the construction theory of frustration. He highlighted the shift in judicial opinion away from the implied term theory over time, indicating that the construction theory has gained greater favour.

In conclusion, the National Carriers case reaffirms that a lease, while conferring a proprietary interest in land, is also a contractual arrangement subject to ordinary contractual principles. The decision reflects the flexibility of the frustration doctrine in lease agreements and aligns with the construction theory articulated in Davis v Fareham UDC.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.