Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co [2010]

Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm), also simply referred to as The Mamola Challenger, examined the nature of damages in contract law, specifically addressing reliance loss as a species of expectation loss. The central principle established is that damages for reliance loss can only be claimed if the gross profits from the contract would have at least equaled the claimant's expenditure.

The facts of the case involved charterers repudiating a charterparty, despite the hire price being below the market rate. The ship owner elected to terminate the contract and chartered out the ship at a higher rate. The ship owner then claimed damages for the lost expenses incurred in preparation for the original charterparty, although these expenses had been entirely mitigated by the higher rate of the new charterparty.

The High Court, in its judgment delivered by Teare J, held that the claim for damages failed, and only nominal damages could be awarded. The judge emphasised that reliance losses are a subset of expectation losses and are not awarded on a different legal basis. The claimant can choose to frame the claim in damages on either the reliance or expectation basis, but recovery of expenditure is only allowed if gross profits exceed it. The burden of proof falls on the defendant to show that gross profits would not have equaled or exceeded the claimant's expenditure.

Teare J justified this approach by stating that if expenditure were recoverable without considering expectation loss, the defendant would effectively underwrite the claimant's decision to enter into the contract. Moreover, if the contract was a disadvantageous deal for the claimant, as expenses were likely to exceed gross profit, it would be illogical for the defendant to pay damages equal to the expenditure, as the breach did not cause that particular loss.

In the context of this specific case, where the ship owner's loss was entirely mitigated by the higher rate from the new charterparty, the court concluded that there was no additional loss to be compensated. Allowing compensation would have put the ship owner in a better position than if the contract had been performed.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.