Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957]

Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957]

Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] EWCA Civ 5 is an English contract law case that revolves around whether a representation about a car's model year, made by the seller, should be considered a contractual term or a mere representation.

Williams sold a Morris car to Oscar Chess Ltd for £290, describing it as a 1948 Morris 10. However, the car was, in fact, a 1939 model worth only £175. Williams genuinely believed it was a 1948 model, relying on the car log book, which turned out to be a forgery. In response, Oscar Chess Ltd initiated a claim for breach of contract, contending that the representation regarding the car’s model year was a contractual term of the sale agreement.

The Court of Appeal, in delivering its judgment, rejected the claim brought by Oscar Chess Ltd. The court held that the statement asserting the car to be a 1948 model was not intended to be a term of the contract; instead, it was deemed an innocent representation for which no damages could be awarded.

Denning LJ, in providing the reasoning for the decision, established a test for determining the incorporation of representations as contractual terms. The central question was whether the statement was intended to be a term, with this intention being inferred from the perspective of an objective bystander. Significantly, if the seller, when making a factual statement, explicitly indicated that they possessed no personal knowledge but were conveying information from another source, it was considered challenging to imply a warranty.

In the specific context of this case, Denning LJ highlighted that the car had changed hands multiple times before reaching Oscar Chess Ltd. Both parties were cognisant that the motor dealer had no personal knowledge of the car's model year and was relying on the information contained in the registration book. In light of these circumstances, an intelligent bystander would reasonably conclude that the seller did not intend to bind themselves to a warranty regarding the car's model year.

Denning LJ's reasoning illustrates the significance of clear communication and contextual understanding in determining the nature of a statement – whether it constitutes a contractual term or a non-binding representation. In this instance, the seller's explicit disclaimer of personal knowledge played a pivotal role in shaping the court's view of the statement as a representation rather than a contractual term.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.