Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021]

Pakistan International Airlines Corp v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40 revolved around economic duress and the attempt by Times Travel, travel agents, to set aside an agreement with Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (PIAC).

PIAC was the sole operator of direct flights from the UK to Pakistan, constituting a significant portion of Times Travel's business. The background involved claims for nonpayment of commissions, prompting PIAC to initiate new contracts and compel the agents to accept them, thereby waiving existing claims for unpaid commissions. While Times Travel initially accepted the terms, it later asserted that it entered the new agreement under economic duress and sought to recover its commissions.

In the High Court, Warren J ruled in favour of Times Travel, finding economic duress. However, the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, asserting that the pressure exerted was lawful, and there was no evidence of bad faith on PIAC's part.

The Supreme Court ultimately sided with PIAC, determining that there was no duress. The notice given by PIAC regarding the termination of the previous contract and the reduction in Times Travel's ticket allocation was not deemed reprehensible conduct in the legal sense. The court accepted that PIAC genuinely believed it was not liable to pay the disputed commissions.

Lord Hodge, delivering the judgment, emphasised the cautious approach required in extending the doctrine of lawful act duress, especially in contractual negotiations between commercial entities. He highlighted the existing remedies in equity, such as the doctrines of undue influence and unconscionable bargains, and underscored the absence of a general doctrine of good faith in English contract law.

The judgment outlined two circumstances where the English courts have recognised and provided a remedy for lawful act duress. The first involves the exploitation of knowledge of criminal activity by the claimant or their close family member to obtain a personal benefit. The second occurs when a defendant, facing a civil claim by the claimant, manoeuvres the claimant into a vulnerable position through illegitimate means, forcing them to waive their claim.

The absence of a doctrine of inequality of bargaining power and a principle of good faith in English law limits the scope for lawful act economic duress in commercial negotiations. The court highlighted that the pressure applied by a negotiating party would rarely meet the standard of illegitimate pressure or unconscionable conduct in the context of commercial negotiation.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court rejected the claim of economic duress by Times Travel, emphasising that PIAC's conduct did not amount to illegitimate pressure. The judgment provided clarity on the limited circumstances where lawful act duress might be recognised in English law, particularly within the commercial negotiation framework.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.