Pao On v Lau Yiu Long [1979]

Pao On v Lau Yiu Long [1979] UKPC 17 is a contract law appeal case concerning consideration and duress. The case was appealed from the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which served as the court of final appeal for the colony at that time, so it is relevant for English contract law.

The case involves a contract dispute between Fu Chip Investment Co Ltd (majority owned by Lau Yiu Long and his brother Benjamin) and Tsuen Wan Shing On Estate Co Ltd (majority owned by Pao On and family). The parties engaged in a complex deal involving the exchange of shares in their respective companies rather than a straightforward cash transaction. As part of the agreement, Pao On agreed not to sell a significant portion of the acquired shares for at least a year. Additionally, in the event of a share price drop, Lau Yiu Long agreed to repurchase a portion of the shares at a fixed price. However, Pao On sought to amend this arrangement to an indemnity if the share price fell below a certain level.

The central legal issues revolved around the validity of the amended agreement. Lau Yiu Long contested its validity on two grounds: (1) lack of consideration, as the amendment appeared to be based on a pre-existing duty; and (2) allegations of duress, claiming that the contract was procured under coercion.

Lord Scarman, delivering the Privy Council's advice, dismissed the lack of consideration argument. He clarified that a promise to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation to a third party could be valid consideration. The court rejected the notion that consideration could be invalidated based on threats to repudiate a pre-existing obligation or an unfair use of a dominating bargaining position, particularly in commercial transactions conducted at arm's length.

On the issue of duress, Lord Scarman outlined the criteria for coercion of will that would vitiate consent. Factors included whether the allegedly coerced party protested, had alternative courses of action, received independent advice, and took steps to avoid the contract. In this case, the court concluded that the economic pressure applied was not sufficient to constitute duress. The pressure was deemed to be commercial in nature, driven by a desire to avoid adverse publicity.

The case is significant in clarifying the principles of consideration and duress in the context of commercial contracts. It emphasises the enforceability of agreements, even if modifications involve pre-existing duties, as long as the parties negotiate at arm's length. Additionally, it establishes the criteria for evaluating duress in commercial contexts, requiring a showing that the victim's consent was not voluntary and amounted to a coercion of will.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.