Parasitic Accessory Liability

Parasitic Accessory Liability

Parasitic Accessory Liability (PAL) is a complex and nuanced concept in criminal law, particularly within the context of joint enterprise liability. It extends the liability of individuals who assist or encourage the commission of a crime, even if their assistance or encouragement is not directly related to the principal offence. PAL addresses situations where an accessory (aiding or abetting party) is held liable for additional crimes committed by the principal offender, which were not explicitly agreed upon but are a foreseeable consequence of the original criminal plan.

PAL often arises within the framework of joint enterprise, where two or more individuals collaborate to commit a crime. In such cases, each participant is liable for the actions taken by any member of the group in furtherance of the common purpose. If a secondary crime occurs during the commission of the agreed-upon crime, PAL can hold all participants liable for this secondary crime as well.

A key aspect of PAL is the concept of foreseeability. For an accessory to be held liable for an additional crime under PAL, it must be established that the secondary crime was a foreseeable consequence of the primary criminal enterprise. This does not require that the accessory foresaw the exact crime, but rather that it was within the scope of what could reasonably be anticipated as a consequence of the criminal plan.

The accessory's liability under PAL hinges on their intent to assist or encourage the primary crime and their active participation in the criminal enterprise. The law examines whether the accessory intended to assist or encourage the principal offender and whether their actions contributed to the commission of the crime.

In R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom significantly redefined the doctrine of joint enterprise and parasitic accessory liability in the landmark case of R v Jogee. Before this case, the law often held accessories liable for any foreseeable crimes committed by the principal offender, regardless of the accessory’s intention regarding the secondary crime. Jogee clarified that mere foresight of the possibility of a secondary crime is insufficient for liability. Instead, there must be evidence that the accessory intended to assist or encourage the principal offender in committing the crime.

PAL has been subject to various criticisms, primarily concerning fairness and the scope of criminal liability. Critics argue that holding individuals liable for unforeseen crimes can lead to unjust outcomes, particularly when the secondary crime was not part of the initial agreement. The Jogee ruling aimed to address some of these concerns by tightening the requirements for establishing liability, emphasising the need for intent and a closer connection between the accessory's actions and the secondary crime.

PAL represents a significant aspect of criminal law, dealing with the complexities of joint enterprise and the extent of liability for accessories. The doctrine of PAL ensures that individuals who contribute to criminal enterprises are held accountable for the foreseeable consequences of their actions. However, the evolving legal standards, as highlighted by the Jogee case, reflect ongoing efforts to balance the principles of justice, fairness, and proportionality in the application of this liability.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.