Pepper v Hart [1992]

Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3 is a landmark decision of the House of Lords that established the principle allowing courts to refer to statements made in the House of Commons or House of Lords when interpreting ambiguous primary legislation. The case arose from a dispute over the interpretation of the Finance Act 1976, where teachers at Malvern College claimed a tax concession on fees for their children. The House of Lords, using statements in Parliament as recorded in Hansard, found in favour of the teachers. However, the decision faced criticism and subsequent limitations on its application.

Teachers at Malvern College, including John Hart, benefited from a concessionary fee scheme for their children's education. The Inland Revenue sought to tax this benefit under the Finance Act 1976. The dispute centred on the interpretation of the term cost equivalent in the Act. The teachers argued for a narrow interpretation based on marginal cost, while the Inland Revenue advocated for a broader interpretation involving average cost.

The case progressed through the High Court and Court of Appeal before reaching the House of Lords. The Lords, aware of statements in Parliament related to the Finance Act, reconvened as a 7-judge panel. In the judgment, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, supported by Lord Griffiths, allowed reference to Parliamentary material as an aid to interpreting ambiguous legislation. However, this was subject to certain conditions, including the material clearly disclosing the legislative intention and avoiding violation of parliamentary privilege.

Pepper v Hart marked a departure from the traditional rule that prohibited the use of Hansard and parliamentary debates in interpreting statutes. It broadened the sources courts could consider when faced with ambiguous legislation. The decision aimed to ascertain legislative intent and mitigate uncertainties in statutory interpretation.

However, the decision faced criticism for potential drawbacks, including increased litigation costs and challenges to the separation of powers. Subsequent cases such as Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2022) have limited the application of Pepper v Hart, leading to a more cautious approach in referring to legislative history. Despite criticism, references to Hansard have increased in the 21st century, indicating continued debate over the scope and impact of Pepper v Hart.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.