Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980]

Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] UKHL 2 stands as a notable English contract law case decided by the House of Lords, addressing issues related to the construction of a contract and the doctrine of fundamental breach.

Photo Production Ltd engaged Securicor to provide night-time security for their premises. Unfortunately, a night-watchman's act of starting a fire for warmth led to the accidental destruction of Photo Production's plant, incurring damages of £648,000. Securicor sought refuge in an exemption clause within the contract, stating that they would not be responsible for any injurious act or default by their employees unless such an act or default could have been foreseen and avoided through due diligence. Photo Productions argued that the doctrine of fundamental breach invalidated the exclusion clause, as the breach went to the root of the contract.

Lord Denning MR at the Court of Appeal held that the doctrine of fundamental breach applied, rendering Securicor liable. According to Denning, if the breach was fundamental, the exclusion clause would be invalid. He introduced the idea that the court would not allow a party to rely on an exemption or limitation clause if it would be unfair or unreasonable to do so. Denning considered factors such as the standard form of the clause, equality of bargaining power, and the nature of the breach.

The House of Lords, however, overturned the Court of Appeal's decision. Lord Diplock asserted that the effectiveness of the exclusion clause was a matter of contract construction, and it did cover the damage in question. Lord Wilberforce, writing for the Court, rejected Denning's application of the doctrine of fundamental breach and favoured a "rule of construction" approach. Wilberforce argued that exemption clauses should be interpreted like any other contract term, regardless of whether a breach occurred. The focus should be on the construction of the contract.

The case is significant for three main reasons. Firstly, it explicitly rejected the doctrine of fundamental breach under English contract law, marking a departure from the previous approach. Secondly, it highlighted the tension between the Court of Appeal, led by Lord Denning, and the House of Lords. The latter disapproved of Denning's attempts to reshape the law based on his perception of justice. Lastly, the case affirmed the principles established in the Suisse Atlantique case, considered the final statement of the common law before the enactment of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.