Pros and Cons of Purposive Approach to Statutory Interpretation

The Purposive Approach is a principle of statutory interpretation that requires judges to interpret a statute in a way that gives effect to the legislature's intended purpose or objective. While the Purposive Approach can be helpful in achieving a just and equitable interpretation of a statute, it also has both pros and cons.

Pros of Purposive Approach

Clarity and Adaptability
The purposive approach to statutory interpretation focuses on understanding the law's intended purpose, which often leads to clearer and more adaptable applications. By considering the law’s overall objectives, judges can interpret statutes in a way that addresses modern contexts and issues that the original lawmakers may not have foreseen. This approach helps ensure that the law remains relevant and effective in a changing society.

Alignment with Legislative Intent
One of the significant advantages of the purposive approach is its alignment with the legislature's intent. By concentrating on the purpose behind a statute, judges can make decisions that reflect the true intentions of lawmakers, thereby maintaining the integrity and spirit of the law. This method reduces the risk of rigidly adhering to the literal meaning of words, which may not fully capture the legislative aim.

Flexibility in Interpretation
The purposive approach provides flexibility in interpreting statutes, allowing judges to consider the broader context and societal values. This flexibility is particularly useful in cases where the literal interpretation of the law would result in absurd or unjust outcomes. By focusing on the purpose, judges can avoid such pitfalls and deliver judgments that promote justice and fairness.

Cons of Purposive Approach

Judicial Overreach
One of the primary criticisms of the purposive approach is the potential for judicial overreach. Critics argue that this method grants judges too much discretion, allowing them to impose their views and potentially alter the meaning of the law based on their interpretations of its purpose. This can undermine the principle of separation of powers, as it blurs the line between legislative and judicial functions.

Uncertainty and Inconsistency
The purposive approach can lead to uncertainty and inconsistency in legal interpretations. Different judges may have varying opinions on the purpose of a statute, leading to divergent outcomes in similar cases. This variability can make it difficult for individuals and businesses to predict how the law will be applied, potentially undermining confidence in the legal system.

Complexity and Time-Consuming
Interpreting the purpose behind a statute can be a complex and time-consuming process. It often requires extensive examination of legislative history, debates, and other extrinsic materials, which can prolong legal proceedings. This complexity can increase the cost of litigation and place additional burdens on the judicial system.

The purposive approach to statutory interpretation offers significant benefits, including clarity, adaptability, and alignment with legislative intent. However, it also presents challenges such as potential judicial overreach, uncertainty, and increased complexity. Balancing these pros and cons is crucial for ensuring that statutory interpretation serves the interests of justice while respecting the boundaries of judicial authority.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.