R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005]

R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 is a House of Lords case clarifying that there were no limits to the type of legislation that could be passed using the Parliament Acts except for the express limitations contained in the legislation.

In 2004, the Hunting Act was enacted to prohibit fox hunting. Although this bill received support in the House of Commons, it received continual opposition in the House of Lords. The Parliament Act 1949 was used to bypass the House of Lords’ ability to delay bills, and subsequently the bill received royal assent.

The claimant, Jackson, brought a claim on behalf of the Countryside Alliance and the pro-fox hunting lobby, attempting to assert that the Hunting Act 2004 was invalid as Parliament Acts procedure could not be used to effect fundamental constitutional changes.

Both the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal rejected the claim. This decision was upheld by the House of Lords ruling that legislation passed using the mechanisms in the Parliament Acts are primary legislation, rather than subordinate, and thus their validity would not be impeded were the Parliament Acts unlawful. Therefore, the Parliament Act 1949 had been validly passed using the Parliament Act 1911 and the Hunting Act was consequently also held to be an Act of Parliament.

The significance of the case is that it poses three challenges to the sovereignty of Parliament:
  1. Courts can decide whether an Act of Parliament is valid or not, meaning courts have the power to strike down an Act of Parliament.
  2. Future Parliaments may be bound by a previous Parliament because Parliament is required to follow the procedure laid out by previous Parliaments in Acts of Parliament.
  3. Courts might have the authority to strike down an Act of Parliament if it violated fundamental constitutional principles, which means Parliament is bound by those principles.

In this case, the court held that it had jurisdiction to examine the validity of the Hunting Act as a question of statutory interpretation, whether the 1911 Act could be used to enact the 1949 Act. This was a significant challenge to the orthodox view of parliamentary sovereignty, expressed by Albert Venn Dicey, that Parliament can make and unmake law on any topic and that no body can make a higher form of law than Parliament or set aside primary legislation.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.