R v Armel Gnango [2011]

R v Armel Gnango [2011]

R v Armel Gnango [2011] UKSC 59 revolved around the application of joint enterprise rules in this complex scenario. The defendant was actively engaged in attempting to harm or murder someone (Bandana Man), and the question was whether joint enterprise could be applied, making the defendant equally guilty of Ms Pniewska's murder. The interaction between joint enterprise and transferred malice was a key consideration.

On October 2, 2007, a shootout occurred in southeast London, resulting in the death of Magda Pniewska, a 26-year-old Polish care worker caught in the crossfire. Armel Gnango, along with another individual referred to as Bandana Man, engaged in the gunfight over a debt dispute. Scientific examination revealed that Bandana Man, not Gnango, fired the fatal shot.

Gnango was charged with attempted murder, possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life, and the murder of Pniewska. Despite not firing the fatal shot, he was convicted of Pniewska's murder under joint enterprise and transferred malice doctrines.

Gnango appealed his murder conviction, and the Court of Appeal quashed it in 2010. The court ruled that the jury was not properly directed on the shared common purpose and the need to consider whether both parties intended not only to shoot but also to be shot at.

The case reached the Supreme Court, where a 6-1 majority allowed the Crown's appeal and restored Gnango's murder conviction. The court held that Gnango was guilty of murder under joint enterprise and transferred malice, even though he did not fire the fatal shot. The court rejected the notion of treating the intention to have an affray as separate from the intention to have a potentially homicidal shooting match.

The decision faced criticism for its potential alignment with public opinion and its impact on the law of joint enterprise. Some argued that the court's reasoning was uncomfortable, and the outcome might not align with established legal principles. The case raised concerns about the complexities of joint enterprise law and the potential implications for similar cases in the future.

Following the Supreme Court's decision, Gnango's sentence of detention for life with a minimum term of twenty years for murder was restored by the Court of Appeal. The Law Commission noted that the case highlighted difficulties in joint enterprise cases and emphasised the need for legislative reform.

In summary, the case explored complex issues related to joint enterprise, transferred malice, and the shared common purpose in the context of a fatal shooting involving two parties. The Supreme Court's decision reinstated Gnango's murder conviction, sparking discussions about the challenges and potential reforms in the law of joint enterprise.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.