R v Blackman [2017]

R v Blackman [2017] EWCA Crim 190 is a notable criminal law case heard by the Court Martial Appeal Court, addressing the withdrawal of a murder charge and substitution with manslaughter based on uncontested evidence of diminished responsibility. The case involves a soldier convicted of murdering an insurgent and later appealing on the grounds that evidence related to his adjustment disorder was not adequately considered.

A soldier was initially convicted of the murder of an insurgent. Subsequently, he appealed, asserting that his adjustment disorder, a form of mental health condition, was not appropriately considered during the trial. The Court Martial Appeal Court allowed the appeal, leading to the substitution of the murder conviction with manslaughter. The court recognised the persuasive nature of the medical evidence related to the soldier's adjustment disorder.

The court emphasised the rarity of judges exercising the power to withdraw a murder charge from the jury, particularly when the prosecution does not concede to the evidence supporting diminished responsibility. Despite acknowledging the infrequency, the court held that this case warranted the withdrawal. It emphasised that the decision to substitute the conviction for manslaughter hinged on establishing the defence of diminished responsibility on a balance of probabilities.

The court acknowledged the persuasive nature of the medical evidence related to the soldier's adjustment disorder. Even though the case did not fall under the rare instances mentioned, the evidence warranted reconsideration. The ultimate decision was to substitute the conviction with manslaughter, reflecting the court's acceptance that, on a balance of probabilities, the defence for diminished responsibility could be established.

This case highlights the exceptional nature of withdrawing murder charges based on diminished responsibility evidence. The case serves as a reminder that such decisions are rare and require a careful assessment of the evidence, even when the prosecution contests the validity of the defence. The court's focus on the balance of probabilities underscores the nuanced considerations in cases involving mental health conditions and criminal responsibility.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.