R v Cunningham [1957]

R v Cunningham [1957] 3 WLR 76 is an English criminal law case that established the Cunningham test of recklessness. This case provided clarification on the mens rea required for a particular offence, emphasising the need for a specific level of intent to accompany the commission of an unlawful act.

The defendant removed a gas meter to steal money, leading to the gradual leakage of gas that partially asphyxiated a neighbour. The defendant was charged with violating Section 23 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (maliciously administering poison so as to endanger life or inflict grievous bodily harm).

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that for an individual to act "maliciously", there had to be proof that he intended to cause the harm in question or was reckless as to whether such harm would occur. The court clarified that recklessness, in this context, involved the defendant being aware of the risk that his actions might cause the prohibited consequence. It emphasised that recklessness was a subjective state of mind.

The key legal principle established by Cunningham is that the term "maliciously" requires either an intention to cause harm or recklessness regarding the risk of causing harm. Recklessness involves the defendant's awareness of the potential risks associated with his actions which would cause a particular result.

In other words, the mens rea for the offence under Section 23 involves a subjective assessment of the defendant's state of mind. To act maliciously, the defendant must either have the specific intent to cause specific harm or be aware of the risk that his actions might result in specific harm.

The case set a precedent for cases where an enhanced mens rea is required for a specific class of offence. It highlighted the necessity of considering the foreseeability or awareness of consequences and clarified the relationship between mens rea and the commission of unlawful acts. R v Faulkner [1877] was referenced to underscore the importance of distinguishing between mens rea for different crimes, such as larceny and arson. The decision in Cunningham contributed to the establishment of Cunningham recklessness, an important test for specific intent in various criminal contexts.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.