R v Dawson [1985]

R v Dawson [1985] 81 Cr App R 150 deals with constructive manslaughter, focusing on the necessity for physical harm to be foreseeable to a sober and reasonable person with the same knowledge as the defendant. The case involves a robbery where the victim suffered a fatal heart attack due to shock, unbeknownst to the defendants.

The defendants robbed a petrol station, brandishing a replica gun and threatening a 60-year-old man, the victim. Subsequently, the victim experienced a fatal heart attack from the shock induced by the incident. Importantly, the defendants were unaware of the victim's pre-existing heart condition. The defendants were convicted of constructive manslaughter.

The primary issue was whether, in constructive manslaughter, the physical harm resulting from the unlawful act must be foreseeable to a sober and reasonable person with the same knowledge as the defendant. The court scrutinised the judge's directions to the jury, particularly the standard for foreseeability and whether it appropriately considered the knowledge possessed by the defendants.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashing the conviction. Watkins LJ emphasised that the test for determining whether an unlawful act is likely to cause harm should be based on the knowledge gained by a sober and reasonable person as if they were present at the scene, witnessing the unlawful act. This standard requires the person to possess the same knowledge as the defendant, and no more.

Watkins LJ clarified that the reasonable person, sharing the defendant's knowledge, would not have foreseen V's weak heart and the subsequent heart attack. Therefore, the judge erred in directing the jury to consider the foreseeability of harm without accounting for the specific knowledge held by the defendants.

The case highlights the nuanced nature of the foreseeability standard in constructive manslaughter. While the test is predominantly objective, it introduces a subjective element concerning the defendant's knowledge. This decision underscores the importance of aligning the foreseeability assessment with the actual knowledge possessed by the defendant at the time of the unlawful act. It establishes a more tailored and context-specific approach to evaluating foreseeability in constructive manslaughter cases, ensuring a fair and accurate determination of criminal liability.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.