R v G [2003]

R v G and Another [2003] UKHL 50 is a significant ruling in English criminal law that addressed the concept of recklessness and specifically dealt with the objective recklessness test set out in the earlier case of R v Caldwell [1982].

Two boys, aged 11 and 12, were camping without their parents' permission and set fire to some newspapers they found in the back yard of a shophouse. They left the scene, leaving the burning papers behind. The fire spread, causing approximately £1 million in damage. The boys argued that they expected the fire to burn itself out and were aware of the risk but believed it would not cause harm.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged the criticisms of the Caldwell test but initially felt bound by it. However, they referred the matter to the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords for further consideration. Lord Bingham, delivering the leading opinion of the unanimous decision, modified the Caldwell test.

According to Lord Bingham, a person acts recklessly if:
  1. He is aware of a risk that a circumstance exists or will exist.
  2. He is aware of a risk that a particular result will occur.
  3. It is, in the circumstances known to him, unreasonable to take the risk.

This modification brought the test back to a subjective standard, allowing for an assessment based on the defendant's age, experience, and understanding, rather than applying a hypothetical reasonable person standard.

The case of Booth v Crown Prosecution Service [2006] upheld a defendant pedestrian's conviction for criminal damage, where the pedestrian recklessly damaged a vehicle by dashing into the road. This decision emphasised the subjective standard and considered the defendant's awareness of the risk in the circumstances known to him.

The discussion in your information mentions the Age of Criminal Responsibility Bill, which was before Parliament to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 12. This potential change aimed to consider the understanding and capacity of individuals under the age of 12 when determining criminal responsibility.

In summary, this case marked a departure from the objective recklessness test in Caldwell, introducing a more subjective standard that takes into account the defendant's awareness and the reasonableness of their actions in the circumstances known to them.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.