R v Loosely [2001]

R v Loosely [2001] UKHL 53, [2001] 1 WLR 2060 is a legal case that involves the consideration of the principle of entrapment in the context of criminal law. The judgment is presented in the form of opinions from several Lords, including Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead and Lord Mackay of Clashfern.

The case revolves around the concept of entrapment, where law enforcement officials induce or encourage individuals to commit crimes that they might not have committed otherwise. The defendant, Loosely, was alleged to have committed a crime as a result of the actions of undercover police officers.

Lord Nicholls stressed that every court has an inherent duty to prevent the abuse of its process. This duty is crucial to maintaining the rule of law, ensuring that state agents do not misuse their power to oppress citizens.

The Lord articulated that entrapment is not acceptable, as it involves the state luring its citizens into committing crimes and then prosecuting them for those actions. This is seen as a misuse of state power and an abuse of the judicial process.

Lord Nicholls acknowledged the difficulty in defining acceptable police conduct, especially in cases involving consensual crimes committed in private. He noted that there are instances where some degree of active police involvement in the commission of a crime is generally regarded as acceptable, citing examples such as test purchases.

Lord Nicholls also reviewed the historical development of remedies for entrapment in common law countries, noting that while entrapment is not a substantive defence in English law, remedies have been established, including the power to stay criminal proceedings and the power to exclude evidence under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

The role of the courts is seen as standing between the state and its citizens to ensure that the state does not misuse its power. Entrapment is viewed as an instance where the court should protect citizens from improper state conduct. Lords Hoffman and Hutton identified certain factors to be considered when deciding whether to stay proceedings against a defendant, including:
  1. Whether the police acted in good faith.
  2. Whether the police had good reason to suspect the accused of criminal activities.
  3. Whether the police suspected that crime was particularly prevalent in the area of the investigation.
  4. Whether pro-active investigatory techniques were necessary due to the secrecy and difficulty of detecting the criminal activity.
  5. The defendant's circumstances and vulnerability.
  6. The nature of the offence.

Lord Nicholls considered whether the judicial discretion conferred by section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 or the court's power to stay proceedings had been modified by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He concluded that there was no significant difference between the requirements of Article 6 ECHR and English law.

In summary, this case addresses the issues surrounding entrapment, discusses the need to prevent abuse of the legal process, defines acceptable police conduct, and considers the remedies available in cases of entrapment. The judgment reflects the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting individuals from improper state conduct.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.