R v Matthews and Alleyne [2003]

R v Matthews and Alleyne [2003] EWCA Crim 192 addressed the application of the Woollin test established in R v Woollin [1999], clarifying that the test is a rule of evidence rather than a substantive rule of law. The case involved the drowning death of a victim after being thrown into a river by the defendants.

The defendants argued that, despite their knowledge that the victim could not swim, they did not possess the intention for the victim to die. The crucial legal issue in this case was the judge's direction to the jury regarding the test for murder. Specifically, the judge instructed the jury that they must find the defendants guilty of murder if they determined that the defendants had foresight that the victim was virtually certain to die or suffer serious harm.

The Court of Appeal, despite acknowledging a misdirection by the judge, ultimately dismissed the appeal. The rationale provided by Rix LJ focused on the distinction between the tests in Nedrick and Woollin as a rule of evidence rather than a substantive rule of law. Rix LJ clarified that the judge erroneously treated the test from Nedrick and Woollin as a substantive rule, emphasising that the approved direction in those cases did not mandate the jury to find intention for murder based solely on an appreciation that death was 'virtually certain.'

According to the Court of Appeal's ruling, the judge's mischaracterisation of the test did not render the conviction unsafe. The key point emphasised was that the test articulated in Nedrick and Woollin serves as a rule of evidence. It allows the jury to infer intention for murder based on their assessment that death was 'virtually certain,' but it does not dictate that they must find intention in every case where this level of foresight is present.

In essence, Rix LJ clarified that the Woollin test is not a strict formula requiring automatic intent for murder; rather, it provides a permissible inference that the jury may draw in light of the degree of foresight demonstrated by the defendants. The case highlights the importance of correctly characterising the nature of the Woollin test as a rule of evidence, maintaining the distinction between evidentiary considerations and the substantive elements of the crime of murder.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.