R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000]

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [1999] UKHL 33, [2000] 2 AC 115 concerned the restriction imposed by the Home Secretary on prisoners' oral interviews with journalists. Simms and another prisoner, both serving life sentences for murder, challenged the Home Secretary's stance, arguing that it violated their right to freedom of speech as protected under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Under the authority of the Prison Act 1952 Section 47(1), the Home Secretary had enacted Prison Service Standing Order 5, paragraph 37-A. This order limited oral interviews with journalists, asserting that the content must remain unpublished. The prisoners contended that this restriction hindered the possibility of any meaningful investigation into their convictions, as speaking out was crucial to such inquiries. Despite this restriction, the prisoners were still permitted to engage in written correspondence.

The prisoners sought judicial review proceedings to challenge the Home Secretary's restriction. Latham J initially ruled in favour of allowing oral interviews, but the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, concluding that the prisoners were not entitled to conduct such interviews.

Upon appeal, the House of Lords sided with the prisoners. Lord Steyn delivered the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann concurred, emphasising that while parliamentary sovereignty allows legislation contrary to fundamental human rights, the principle of legality requires Parliament to openly confront the political consequences of such actions. This means that fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous language in legislation.

The case is noteworthy for establishing that parliamentary sovereignty, while a fundamental principle in the UK legal system, does not grant unlimited power to legislate against basic human rights. The judgment underscored the importance of clear and explicit language in legislation when attempting to restrict fundamental rights. It highlighted the courts' role in ensuring that even general legislative language is presumed to be subject to the basic rights of individuals, aligning the UK legal system with constitutional principles found in other countries with express limitations on legislative power.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.