R v Williams [1923]
Share
R v Williams [1923] 1 KB 340 established a crucial legal principle regarding the impact of mistake on the validity of consent in cases of sexual intercourse. The court ruled that, under common law, a mistake as to the sexual nature of intercourse vitiates consent, thereby rendering the act tantamount to rape.
The facts of the case involved Williams, the defendant, providing singing lessons to the victim and engaging in sexual activity with her under the pretence that it would enhance her breathing. The Court of Criminal Appeal was tasked with determining the legal implications of this scenario.
The court held that Williams was indeed guilty of rape. The reasoning behind this decision was rooted in the principle that the victim did not provide valid consent to the sexual intercourse since it was obtained under false pretences. This decision aligns with the precedent set in the case of R v Flattery [1877], which established that submission to intercourse based on a false pretence is considered unlawful.
The court's ruling reflected a recognition that consent, for it to be valid, must be genuine and informed. In cases where a person is misled or deceived about the true nature of the sexual act, any apparent agreement to engage in such activity is not considered legally valid consent.
This legal principle reinforces the importance of transparency and honesty in intimate relationships, emphasising that consent is vitiated when obtained through deceit or false representations regarding the nature of the sexual activity.
The facts of the case involved Williams, the defendant, providing singing lessons to the victim and engaging in sexual activity with her under the pretence that it would enhance her breathing. The Court of Criminal Appeal was tasked with determining the legal implications of this scenario.
The court held that Williams was indeed guilty of rape. The reasoning behind this decision was rooted in the principle that the victim did not provide valid consent to the sexual intercourse since it was obtained under false pretences. This decision aligns with the precedent set in the case of R v Flattery [1877], which established that submission to intercourse based on a false pretence is considered unlawful.
The court's ruling reflected a recognition that consent, for it to be valid, must be genuine and informed. In cases where a person is misled or deceived about the true nature of the sexual act, any apparent agreement to engage in such activity is not considered legally valid consent.
This legal principle reinforces the importance of transparency and honesty in intimate relationships, emphasising that consent is vitiated when obtained through deceit or false representations regarding the nature of the sexual activity.
