Re Polemis & Furness, Witty [1921]

Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co Ltd [1921] 3 KB 560 stands as a pivotal English tort law case that significantly shaped the legal landscape surrounding causation and remoteness in the law of negligence. This case, decided by the Court of Appeal, introduced the concept of strict liability, where a defendant could be held responsible for all consequences resulting from their negligent conduct, regardless of foreseeability.

The incident leading to the legal dispute involved stevedore employees loading cargo into a ship. Due to the negligence of an employee, a plank fell into the ship's hold, causing a spark that ignited petrol vapours and resulted in a catastrophic explosion. The ship incurred significant damage, ultimately becoming a total loss.

The arbitrator, upon examination of the matter, found that the defendant's negligence in causing the plank to fall was the direct cause of the subsequent fire. The arbitrators awarded damages to the plaintiff, a decision that the defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal affirmed the defendant's liability, establishing the principle of strict liability. The court held that if an act would or might probably cause damage, the exact nature of the damage was immaterial. Thus, the defendant was deemed liable for all direct consequences of their negligent act, even if the specific damage was unforeseeable.

Re Polemis was a landmark decision at the time, exemplifying the concept of strict liability. However, its significance diminished over time, particularly with the emergence of subsequent landmark decisions, such as Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] and The Wagon Mound (No 1). These later decisions signalled a departure from strict liability, emphasising the importance of foreseeability in determining liability for negligence.

The Privy Council's disapproval of the Re Polemis decision, as evident in The Wagon Mound (No 1), marked a shift in legal principles. While Re Polemis technically remains good law and has not been overruled by an English court, its strict liability principle has not been consistently followed. The evolving legal landscape saw a move away from strict liability, making foreseeability a critical factor in assessing liability for negligence.

The legal landscape post-1932 dictates that defendants are liable in negligence only if the breach of the duty of care could have been foreseen to cause loss, damage, or injury. An exception, the eggshell skull rule, applies only to personal injury cases. This rule dictates that the defendant must take the victim as they find them, as illustrated in the case of Smith v Leech Brain [1962].

In summary, while Re Polemis was instrumental in introducing strict liability, subsequent legal developments have shifted towards a more nuanced approach, emphasising foreseeability as a crucial determinant of liability in negligence cases.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.