Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution [1981]

Re Resolution to Amend the Constitution [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, holds significant historical importance within the context of the negotiations for the patriation of the Constitution of Canada. This Supreme Court of Canada reference case unfolded as the federal government, led by Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, sought to bring the constitution home and sought the United Kingdom Parliament's assistance in amending it. Initially lacking support from several provincial governments, the federal plan aimed to create a domestic amendment formula and entrench the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

During the impasse between the federal government and eight opposing provinces, three provincial governments — Newfoundland, Quebec, and Manitoba — referred questions of law to their provincial Courts of Appeal on the constitutionality of the federal government's proposed plan. These reference cases set the stage for a critical legal examination of the constitutional process.

In the Quebec Reference Case, the Court unanimously affirmed that proposed amendments would impact the legislative competence of provincial legislatures. However, the judges were divided on whether the federal government had the authority to make unilateral changes to the constitution.

The Manitoba Reference Case posed questions about the impact of proposed amendments on provincial powers and the existence of constitutional conventions. The Manitoba Court of Appeal ruled that the federal government could act unilaterally.

Similarly, the Newfoundland Reference Case raised questions about the effect of amendments on provincial powers and included an inquiry about amending the Terms of Union without provincial consent. The Newfoundland Court of Appeal ruled against federal unilateral action.

Upon appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court unanimously acknowledged the impact of proposed changes on the powers, rights, or privileges of the provinces. However, a majority of seven judges determined that the federal government had the legal authority to unilaterally seek an amendment to the constitution without provincial consent.

The Court's decision, the first to be televised live on national television, extended its significance beyond Canada. It highlighted the existence of constitutional conventions but, controversially, the majority argued that it was not the role of the courts to enforce these conventions. The aftermath of the case, as detailed by historian Frédéric Bastien, introduced elements of controversy and raised questions about the legitimacy and independence of the judiciary during the Patriation Reference.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.