Reasonable Care

Reasonable care is a key concept in Tort Law that refers to the level of caution and prudence that an ordinary, reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances. It serves as a standard against which the defendant's conduct is measured to determine whether he has breached his duty of care in a negligence claim.

Objective standard: The standard of reasonable care is an objective one, meaning it is based on how a hypothetical reasonable person would act, rather than the subjective characteristics or abilities of the actual defendant. The law assumes that individuals are capable of behaving reasonably and expects them to do so.

Circumstantial considerations: The determination of reasonable care takes into account the specific circumstances surrounding the defendant's conduct. Factors such as the nature of the activity, the knowledge or expertise of the defendant, the presence of any industry or professional standards, and any foreseeable risks or dangers are considered in evaluating whether the defendant's actions met the required standard.

Balancing risks and precautions: Reasonable care involves a balancing act between the risks inherent in a particular situation and the precautions that a reasonable person would take to prevent harm. The degree of caution required may vary depending on the level of risk involved. For instance, in activities that pose significant dangers, a higher level of care and precaution would be expected.

Foreseeability: Reasonable care is assessed based on what a reasonable person would have anticipated as potential risks or harm in the given circumstances. It focuses on whether the harm suffered by the plaintiff was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the defendant's conduct. If the harm was reasonably foreseeable, the defendant may be held accountable for failing to take appropriate precautions.

Professional standards: In certain cases, the standard of reasonable care may be influenced by the defendant's professional status or expertise. Professionals, such as doctors or architects, are typically held to a higher standard of care based on the knowledge and skills expected within their specific field. They are expected to exercise the level of care and skill that a reasonable professional in their position would exercise.

Adaptation to circumstances: The concept of reasonable care is adaptable and can evolve based on changes in technology, societal norms, and common practices. What may have been considered reasonable care in the past may no longer meet the current standard due to advancements or changes in knowledge.

The determination of reasonable care is made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific facts and circumstances involved. It is the duty of the court or jury to evaluate the evidence presented and decide whether the defendant's actions fell below the expected level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in similar circumstances.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.