Redgrave v Hurd [1881]

Redgrave v Hurd [1881] 20 Ch D 1 is a significant English contract law case that deals with the issue of misrepresentation. The ruling in this case establishes the principle that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even if the representee had the opportunity to verify the false statement but chose not to.

Mr Redgrave, an elderly solicitor, advertised for a partner to join his business and purchase the associated house. During an interview with Mr Hurd, he asserted that the practice brought in £300 a year when, in reality, it was only £200 a year. Mr Redgrave presented summaries indicating an average income of £200 a year and claimed that the additional £100 was supported by other papers in the office that Mr Hurd could check. However, these papers, upon inspection, revealed no business. Mr Hurd did not examine the papers until just before the completion of the agreement. Although he had already signed the contract, he refused to proceed, leading Mr Redgrave to sue for specific performance, while Mr Hurd counterclaimed for rescission based on fraudulent misrepresentation.

In the initial judgment, Fry J ruled in favour of Mr Redgrave, holding that since Mr Hurd had not taken the opportunity to check the papers, he could not be considered to have relied on them. However, this decision was appealed. In the Court of Appeal, Sir George Jessel MR, in delivering the judgment on appeal, dismissed Mr Hurd's counterclaim for fraudulent misrepresentation due to the absence of a plea that Mr Redgrave knew his statements were untrue, thus precluding entitlement to damages. Nevertheless, the decision of Fry J was reversed, and the contract was rescinded on grounds of innocent misrepresentation.

Sir George Jessel MR emphasised that for rescission, reliance on the representation was sufficient, and there was no duty on Mr Hurd to inspect the papers. He highlighted the distinction between law and equity, stating that in equity, a person should not be allowed to take advantage of their own false statements. If a material representation induces someone to enter into a contract, it is an inference of law that they were influenced by the representation. Thus, the burden lies with the party alleging otherwise to prove it.

This case stands as a precedent emphasising the significance of reliance on representations in cases of misrepresentation and underscores the equitable principle that one should not benefit from their own false statements.
Back to blog
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.