Rhodes v OPO [2015]

Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 is a significant Supreme Court decision concerning the boundaries between freedom of expression and the protection of vulnerable individuals from psychological harm. The case arose from an attempt by concert pianist James Rhodes’ ex-wife to prevent the publication of his memoir, Instrumental, which detailed the abuse he suffered as a child and its impact on his mental health. The central legal issue was whether the content of the memoir could be restrained on the grounds that it might cause severe emotional distress or psychological harm to their son, who suffers from multiple developmental disorders.

The factual background of the case highlights the tension between the competing rights at play. After a draft of Rhodes' book was leaked to his ex-wife, she sought an injunction in 2014 to prevent its publication or to require significant redactions. Her concern was that the detailed descriptions of abuse and its aftermath could cause serious harm to their son, who had been diagnosed with conditions including Asperger’s syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The claim was brought under the tort first recognised in Wilkinson v Downton [1897], which addresses intentional infliction of mental shock.

In the first instance, the High Court dismissed the application for an interim injunction. Bean J held that Wilkinson v Downton did not extend to true statements, focusing on the fact that the tort traditionally applied to deliberate falsehoods or threats. However, the Court of Appeal took a different view and granted the injunction. The Court of Appeal held that the tort could apply even where the statement in question was true, provided it was unjustified and that the defendant either intended to cause harm or was reckless as to whether harm might result. This approach broadened the potential scope of the tort to include situations where truthful statements could still be actionable if they were likely to cause harm.

The case reached the Supreme Court, which ultimately overturned the Court of Appeal’s ruling. The Supreme Court clarified the elements required for the tort under Wilkinson v Downton: conduct, mental state, and consequences. The conduct element requires that the words or behaviour be directed towards the claimant without justification or reasonable excuse. In Rhodes’ case, the court emphasised the importance of freedom of expression and ruled that reporting the truth, even when distressing, carries significant legal protection. The mental element requires an intention to cause harm, specifically physical injury or severe emotional distress. The Supreme Court firmly rejected the Court of Appeal’s suggestion that recklessness could suffice; an actual intention to cause harm is necessary. As for the consequence element, it involves the need to prove physical harm or recognised psychiatric illness, though this was not central to the case.

The Supreme Court’s decision reaffirmed the principle that freedom of expression, especially in matters of personal experience and reporting the truth, holds a fundamental place in the law. It highlighted that while the tort under Wilkinson v Downton remains viable, it must be narrowly defined to prevent excessive interference with free speech. Following the decision, Instrumental was published as planned in May 2015, marking a victory for artistic and personal expression over concerns about potential psychological harm where no malicious intent was involved.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.