Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1973]

Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1973] UKHL 2 is a landmark English contract law case addressing the right to terminate a contract based on performance. The dispute arose from Schuler AG's alleged wrongful termination of the contract with Wickman, where Wickman acted as Schuler's sole representative for marketing panel presses to car makers.

The pivotal clauses in question were Clause 7(b) and Clause 11. Clause 7(b) imposed a requirement on Wickman to visit specific car manufacturers weekly. Clause 11 allowed either party to terminate the agreement on 60 days' notice if the other party was in material breach and failed to rectify the breach within the stipulated period.

Wickman failed to make the required visits initially, which Schuler waived. However, when Wickman made some but not all the visits, Schuler terminated the contract. The central issue was whether Schuler had the right to terminate based on the breaches of Clause 7(b).

The House of Lords, by a majority, held that Schuler was not entitled to terminate. The crucial determination was that Clause 7(b) was not a condition but a term. Lord Reid, in delivering the majority judgment, emphasised that the word "condition" is indicative but not conclusive of the parties' intention. The court considered the unreasonableness of the result if Schuler's interpretation were accepted.

Lord Reid reasoned that when reading Clause 7(b) with Clause 11, notice should be given to remedy the situation, and termination would only be allowed if 60 days passed without compliance. Describing Schuler's interpretation as unreasonable, Lord Reid highlighted the lack of provision for various practical scenarios, making strict adherence to the clause nearly impossible.

Lord Wilberforce dissented, asserting that Clause 7(b) constituted a condition and that Schuler should have the right to terminate. He disagreed with characterising the clause as arbitrary or capricious, emphasising the contractual standard adopted by the parties.

The case underscores the importance of interpreting contractual clauses in harmony with the contract as a whole. It establishes that the mere use of the word "condition" is not conclusive and invites a thorough examination of the contract's overall intention, especially when considering potential unreasonableness. The decision safeguards parties from harsh consequences arising from rigid interpretations of contractual conditions.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.