Six Cases on Duress by Circumstances in Criminal Law

The defence of duress by circumstances has emerged in cases where individuals claim to be compelled to act due to general pressure arising from various circumstances. This subset of duress incorporates some elements of necessity. Six notable cases shed light on this defence:

R v Conway [1988] 3 AER 1025
In this case, the defendant faced a charge of reckless driving after fleeing from police officers. His passenger, recently attacked with a shotgun, urged him to drive off upon seeing plain-clothed officers approaching. The court established the concept of duress of circumstances, requiring the defendant to act believing it necessary to avoid death or serious bodily injury. Woolf LJ emphasised that, whether called duress or necessity, the defence is subject to the same limitations as the traditional do this or else duress.

R v Martin [1989] 1 AER 652
The defendant, driving while disqualified, argued the necessity to drive his son to work, fearing his mentally ill wife's potential suicide if their son did not arrive on time. Simon Brown J defined the defence as arising from wrongful threats, violence, or other objective dangers. The requirements included the accused acting reasonably to avoid a threat, having a good cause to fear death or serious injury, and a jury determining if a sober person of reasonable firmness would respond similarly.

DPP v Bell [1992] Crim LR 176
In this case, the accused pleaded duress of circumstances to driving with excess alcohol. Following an incident in a pub that made him fear for his safety, he escaped in his car, driving a short distance to safety and abandoning the criminal activity promptly. The court accepted the defence, highlighting the requirement that the accused couldn't reasonably act otherwise given the imminent danger.

R v Baker and Wilkins [1997] Crim LR 497 (CA)
In this case involving child custody, the court rejected the duress defence. When a child's mother and another broke down the door to the father's house, three defences were raised, including duress of circumstances. The court held that duress did not cover threats or the fear of long-term psychological injury. Since other lawful remedies were available, duress was denied.

R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607
In a firearm possession case, the defendant claimed to have taken the weapon from another person to prevent its use and hand it to the police. The court convicted him, emphasising the need to act as soon as reasonably possible in response to the circumstances.

R v Abdul Hussain and Others [1999] Crim LR 570
The defendants hijacked a plane to escape perceived imminent peril from the Iraqi authorities. The court held that the defence was available as long as the crime was a reasonable and proportionate response to an imminent peril of death or serious injury, emphasising that the threat need not be immediate, only imminent.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.