Special Criteria for Standing in International Law
Share
While states generally have broad standing in international law, it is important to acknowledge that other entities, such as international organisations, individuals, and non-state actors, may have standing only for specific purposes and within certain tribunals or legal frameworks. The standing of these entities is often limited to the scope of their legal rights and interests as recognised by international law.
International organisations: International organisations may have standing before specific tribunals or bodies for matters falling within their mandate. Their standing can be derived from the treaties or agreements establishing their legal existence and defining their functions. In some cases, international organisations can bring claims on behalf of their member states or intervene in proceedings to protect the interests of their member states or further the objectives of the organisation.
Individuals: While individuals do not generally have direct standing in international law, certain human rights conventions and regional systems have mechanisms in place to allow individuals to bring claims for violations of their fundamental rights. For instance, the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights provide individuals with standing to bring complaints against states for human rights abuses within their respective jurisdictions.
Non-state actors: Non-state actors, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs), may have standing in specific contexts, particularly in the field of human rights or environmental law. They may be granted observer status, allowed to submit amicus curiae briefs, or participate in consultations and hearings before international bodies, providing valuable expertise and perspectives.
The standing of these entities is often subject to specific criteria and requirements set forth by the relevant international court, tribunal, or treaty body. These criteria may include demonstrating a sufficient legal interest, a link to the subject matter of the dispute, or the ability to contribute substantively to the proceedings. It is therefore essential to recognise that standing in international law is not universally granted to all entities in all situations. The determination of standing is context-specific, and it varies depending on the legal framework, the nature of the dispute, and the specific tribunal or body involved.
International organisations: International organisations may have standing before specific tribunals or bodies for matters falling within their mandate. Their standing can be derived from the treaties or agreements establishing their legal existence and defining their functions. In some cases, international organisations can bring claims on behalf of their member states or intervene in proceedings to protect the interests of their member states or further the objectives of the organisation.
Individuals: While individuals do not generally have direct standing in international law, certain human rights conventions and regional systems have mechanisms in place to allow individuals to bring claims for violations of their fundamental rights. For instance, the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights provide individuals with standing to bring complaints against states for human rights abuses within their respective jurisdictions.
Non-state actors: Non-state actors, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs), may have standing in specific contexts, particularly in the field of human rights or environmental law. They may be granted observer status, allowed to submit amicus curiae briefs, or participate in consultations and hearings before international bodies, providing valuable expertise and perspectives.
The standing of these entities is often subject to specific criteria and requirements set forth by the relevant international court, tribunal, or treaty body. These criteria may include demonstrating a sufficient legal interest, a link to the subject matter of the dispute, or the ability to contribute substantively to the proceedings. It is therefore essential to recognise that standing in international law is not universally granted to all entities in all situations. The determination of standing is context-specific, and it varies depending on the legal framework, the nature of the dispute, and the specific tribunal or body involved.
