Stack v Dowden [2007]

Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 stands as a pivotal case in English property law, offering profound insights into the division of interests in family property post the dissolution of a cohabitation relationship. The case, heard in the House of Lords, delves into the complexities of establishing beneficial ownership and the considerations that shape such determinations.

Mr Stack and Ms Dowden cohabited for nearly 18 years, during which they had four children. In 1993, they jointly purchased a house at 114 Chatsworth Road, London. Despite both names appearing on the property's registration, they did not specify their respective shares. Ms Dowden's financial contributions were significant, providing 65% of the purchase price from the sale of her previous property, her savings, and a joint loan. Financial independence, separate accounts, and distinct investments characterised their financial arrangement.

After the relationship ended in 2002, Mr Stack sought a declaration that the property was held on trust as tenants in common, advocating for its sale. The Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's declaration of equal ownership, ordering a 65% to Ms Dowden and 35% to Mr Stack. However, Mr Stack appealed this decision to the House of Lords.

The House of Lords, in a majority decision, held that Ms. Dowden was entitled to a greater share than half the equity – specifically, a 65% interest. The ruling emphasised the departure from the precedent set by Lloyds Bank plc v Rosse [1990]t. Notably, indirect contributions, such as improvements and the pooling of resources, were recognised as significant factors in determining beneficial ownership.

Baroness Hale played a pivotal role, emphasising that the onus lies on the party seeking to demonstrate a divergence between legal and beneficial ownership. Factors beyond financial contributions, including discussions at the time of transfer, the nature of the relationship, and shared responsibilities, were deemed relevant. Financial independence throughout the relationship factored into the decision, leading to a 65/35 split in favour of Ms Dowden.

Lord Neuberger dissented, advocating caution against frequent changes to law and promoting the use of resulting trust when factors beyond direct financial contributions are absent. He underscored the importance of inferring rather than imputing intentions, emphasising that clear evidence of a departure from the initial apportionment is required.

Stack v Dowden is foundational in shaping the legal landscape surrounding cohabiting couples and property ownership. The decision highlights the nuanced considerations, emphasising the need for a holistic assessment of contributions and intentions to ensure a fair distribution of beneficial interests in family homes. The case remains instrumental in guiding subsequent cases dealing with the intricacies of cohabitation breakdowns and property entitlements.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.