Strict Liability Torts
Share
Strict liability torts are legal claims that hold a party liable for harm or injury caused by their actions or products, regardless of whether they were negligent or intended to cause harm.
In a strict liability case, the plaintiff (the injured party) must prove that the defendant engaged in an activity that is inherently dangerous or involves a risk of harm to others, and that the plaintiff was harmed or injured as a result of the defendant's activity or product.
Strict liability torts often arise in cases involving dangerous or defective products, such as drugs, medical devices, and consumer products. They can also apply in cases involving dangerous activities, such as blasting or using explosives. Here are a few specific examples of strict liability torts:
- Product liability: A manufacturer of a power tool has a duty to design and manufacture a product that is reasonably safe for its intended use. If a defect in the product causes harm to a consumer, the manufacturer may be held strictly liable for the harm, regardless of whether they were negligent.
- Ultrahazardous activities: A company that uses explosives to demolish a building has a duty to take appropriate precautions to prevent harm to nearby buildings or people. If the explosion causes harm to a nearby building or person, the company may be held strictly liable for the harm, even if they took all reasonable precautions.
- Dangerous animals: A person who keeps an exotic animal, such as a lion, has a duty to prevent harm to others that may result from the animal's behaviour. If the animal attacks and injures someone, the owner may be held strictly liable for the harm, even if they took precautions to prevent the attack.
- Defective pharmaceuticals: A drug company has a duty to ensure that its products are safe for use and to warn consumers of any known risks or side effects. If a defect in the drug causes harm to a consumer, the drug company may be held strictly liable for the harm, regardless of whether they were negligent.
The plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant was negligent or intended to cause harm. Instead, liability is imposed on the defendant simply because they engaged in the activity or produced the product that caused the harm.
