Top 10 Legal Cases All Australian Law Students Should Know

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1
This landmark High Court case overturned terra nullius and recognised native title in Australian law. The Court held that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ traditional laws and customs regarding land could give rise to legal rights, unless extinguished. This decision reshaped property law, led to the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and acknowledged Indigenous peoples’ pre-existing connection to land, fundamentally altering the legal and moral landscape of Australia.

Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1
The High Court invalidated the Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 (Cth), ruling that Parliament could not unilaterally declare organisations unlawful. The case reinforced the rule of law, stating that laws must conform to the Constitution, and the government cannot usurp judicial power by declaring facts or guilt. This remains a key authority on judicial review, separation of powers, and limits on legislative overreach in Australia.

Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520
The High Court reaffirmed that the Constitution implies freedom of political communication essential for representative government (Sections 7 and 24). It introduced the Lange test, determining whether a law burdens that freedom and, if so, whether the burden is reasonable and proportionate. This case is central to constitutional law, balancing free speech with legitimate governmental regulation, particularly in media and defamation law.

Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292
The High Court held that an accused has a right to a fair trial, and that in serious criminal cases, a court should stay proceedings if the accused is unrepresented through no fault of their own. This does not establish a right to publicly funded legal representation but makes clear that trials should not proceed unfairly. This case has had significant impact on criminal justice, especially in relation to legal aid and procedural fairness.

Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387
The High Court expanded promissory estoppel, allowing it to be used as a sword, not just a shield. Waltons led Maher to believe a contract would be signed, causing Maher to act to his detriment. The Court enforced Waltons’ promise despite no formal contract. This case reshaped contract formation principles, emphasising fairness and reliance where one party induces another to act to their detriment.

Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360
This case reinterpreted Section 92 of the Constitution, which guarantees free interstate trade, holding that it prohibits discriminatory, protectionist burdens rather than all regulations. The Court upheld Tasmanian laws regulating crayfish to protect fisheries, finding they did not target interstate trade unfairly. The decision ended decades of confusion about Section 92 and clarified how economic regulation interacts with the federal structure.

Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476
The High Court struck down a privative clause that sought to exclude judicial review of migration decisions, affirming that judicial review of administrative action is constitutionally entrenched under Section 75(v). This decision reasserted the rule of law, ensuring that executive decisions are always subject to court scrutiny for legal error, even where Parliament tries to limit this oversight.

Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1
Known as the Stolen Generations case, this challenge to the Aboriginals Ordinance 1918 (NT) alleged various constitutional violations. The Court upheld the law but recognised that the Constitution may contain implied rights, including limited rights to legal equality and freedom of religion. Though the plaintiffs failed, this case clarified constitutional protections and the limits of legislative power over Indigenous peoples.

Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1990) 169 CLR 436
The High Court struck down a state law imposing higher fees on interstate beverage containers, ruling it discriminated against interstate trade, violating Section 92. This case clarified that protectionist laws cannot be justified if their burden on interstate trade outweighs any legitimate public interest. It is a leading authority on economic freedom and state regulation under the Constitution.

Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) 233 CLR 162
The High Court ruled that a law disenfranchising all prisoners was unconstitutional, violating the implied right to vote under Sections 7 and 24 (representative democracy). While some limits on voting rights are allowed, blanket bans are not proportionate. This case is pivotal in defining citizen rights, the limits of legislative power, and implied democratic rights under the Constitution.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.