Top 10 Legal Cases All Canadian Law Students Should Know

R v Oakes [1986] 1 SCR 103
This foundational case established the Oakes test, a framework for determining whether a Charter right limitation under Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is justified. The Supreme Court held that any limit on a Charter right must pursue a pressing and substantial objective, and be proportional (i.e. minimally impairing the right and having benefits that outweigh the harms). This case is central to constitutional law and the protection of civil liberties.

R v Morgentaler [1988] 1 SCR 30
Dr Henry Morgentaler challenged Canada’s abortion law. The Supreme Court struck down the existing law as unconstitutional under Section 7 of the Charter (life, liberty, and security of the person), as it imposed significant barriers on women seeking abortions. The Court emphasized bodily autonomy and procedural fairness, making abortion effectively legal in Canada. This landmark ruling remains a cornerstone of reproductive rights and Charter-based liberty interests.

Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217
Following Quebec’s independence referendum, the Supreme Court ruled that unilateral secession by a province is not legal under Canadian or international law. However, a clear referendum result would impose a political obligation on other provinces and the federal government to negotiate. The Court identified four unwritten constitutional principles (federalism, democracy, the rule of law, and minority rights) that must guide such negotiations. The case defines Canada’s constitutional framework and intergovernmental relations.

R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd [1985] 1 SCR 295
Big M Drug Mart was charged under the federal Lord’s Day Act for opening on Sunday. The Supreme Court struck down the law as it violated freedom of religion under Section 2(a) of the Charter. The Court held that laws cannot impose religious practices on individuals. This case reinforced Charter protections against state-imposed religion and clarified that a law’s purpose, not just its effect, determines its constitutionality.

R v Stinchcombe [1991] 3 SCR 326
This case established the Crown’s duty to disclose all relevant evidence to the defence in criminal trials, even if it helps the accused. The Supreme Court ruled that full disclosure is a Charter right under Section 7, ensuring a fair trial. Disclosure must be timely and complete, subject only to privilege or irrelevance. Stinchcombe fundamentally shaped criminal procedure and trial fairness in Canadian law.

R v Jordan [2016] 1 SCR 631
The Supreme Court set new limits on unreasonable delay in criminal trials, ruling that charges must generally be resolved within 18 months in provincial courts and 30 months in superior courts. Delays beyond these limits are presumed unreasonable under Section 11(b) of the Charter, unless justified. This case reshaped the criminal justice system, encouraging timely prosecutions and preventing systemic delay from undermining rights and public confidence.

Reference re Same-Sex Marriage [2004] 3 SCR 698
In this reference case, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of same-sex marriage, ruling that it is consistent with the Charter’s equality rights (Section 15). The Court confirmed that Parliament has authority to legislate on marriage under Section 91(26) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and that recognising same-sex marriage promotes dignity and equality. This paved the way for civil marriage equality across Canada and reflected evolving social and legal values.

R v Sparrow [1990] 1 SCR 1075
This case involved a First Nations fishing rights claim. The Court ruled that Aboriginal rights, protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, are not absolute but cannot be infringed without justification. It established the Sparrow test, assessing whether government action unduly infringes Indigenous rights and whether the infringement is justified. Sparrow is foundational for Aboriginal law and the reconciliation of Indigenous and Crown interests.

Vriend v Alberta [1998] 1 SCR 493
Delwin Vriend was fired from a religious college due to his sexual orientation, which was not protected under Alberta’s human rights legislation. The Supreme Court ruled that excluding sexual orientation violated the Charter’s Section 15 equality guarantee, and read in protection into the law. The case confirmed that Charter rights apply to omissions in legislation and advanced LGBTQ+ rights, reinforcing judicial authority to remedy discriminatory laws.

Hunter v Southam Inc [1984] 2 SCR 145
The Court struck down a law allowing government searches without a warrant, ruling it violated Section 8 of the Charter (protection against unreasonable search and seizure). The case established the reasonable expectation of privacy and that searches require judicial authorisation. This early Charter case shaped privacy rights and set the standard for interpreting fundamental freedoms in a free and democratic society.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.