Top 10 Legal Cases All Singaporean Law Students Should Know

Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General [2012] SGCA 45
This case confirmed that individuals have standing to challenge laws affecting them personally, even if no prosecution is underway. Tan Eng Hong challenged Section 377A of the Penal Code, criminalising male homosexual acts. The Court of Appeal held he had sufficient interest for a constitutional challenge. This case is significant for access to justice, human rights litigation, and the scope of judicial review in Singapore.

Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing [2016] SGCA 21
This case concerned discretion in imposing the death penalty for murder. The Court clarified when capital punishment is appropriate under amended sentencing laws. The judgment outlined the principle of finality in criminal appeals, stating that repeated applications to re-open cases should only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. It is crucial for criminal procedure, sentencing, and legal certainty in capital cases.

Shadrake Alan v Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 26
British writer Alan Shadrake was convicted of scandalising the judiciary for publishing a book criticising Singapore’s judiciary. The Court of Appeal affirmed the offence but clarified the test for contempt: whether statements posed a real risk of undermining public confidence in the judiciary. This case balances freedom of expression with protection of judicial authority, and is key for understanding contempt laws in Singapore.

Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor [1981] AC 648 (PC)
A Privy Council decision (when Singapore still accepted its jurisdiction), it upheld mandatory death penalties for drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. However, it established that laws must not violate natural justice and that "law" in Article 9(1) of the Constitution implies fair procedures. Though Singapore now no longer accepts Privy Council rulings, this case influenced the development of constitutional protections and due process principles.

Chee Siok Chin v Minister for Home Affairs [2006] SGHC 195
Chee and others challenged police action during a peaceful protest. The High Court ruled that Article 14 rights (speech, assembly, association) are not absolute, and subject to restrictions for public order. The case is notable for defining the limits of civil liberties, emphasising Singapore’s approach of balancing rights with societal interests, especially in public order and national security contexts.

Attorney-General v Wain [1991] 1 SLR(R) 85
This case involved the publication of "The Hatchet Man of Singapore", criticising government officials. The Court ruled that qualified privilege did not protect the journalist because there was no duty to publish or interest in receiving the information. This decision shaped media law, especially regarding defamation and the limits of press freedom, reinforcing that public interest does not automatically override reputational rights.

Re Judith Prakash [1995] 3 SLR(R) 341
In this disciplinary case, the Court clarified standards of professional conduct expected of lawyers, affirming that advocates and solicitors must act with integrity and diligence. The ruling emphasised the Court’s role in maintaining public confidence in the legal profession, highlighting ethical obligations, especially regarding client relations, honesty, and competence. This case remains central to legal ethics education in Singapore.

City Developments Ltd v Commissioner of Income Tax [1996] SGCA 56
The Court of Appeal addressed tax deduction eligibility for property developers, adopting a purposive approach to statutory interpretation, aligned with Section 9A of the Interpretation Act. This case signalled a shift from literal readings to considering Parliament’s intent, influencing how courts interpret legislation across various legal fields, not just tax law. It remains a touchstone for statutory construction in Singapore.

Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs [1988] 2 SLR(R) 525
The Court of Appeal ruled that executive discretion under the Internal Security Act (ISA) is subject to objective judicial review, not merely subjective satisfaction. Although Parliament later amended the law to reverse this ruling, the case is foundational for administrative law, showing the judiciary’s willingness to review executive power, particularly on matters affecting individual liberty.

Turf Club Auto Emporium v Yeo Boong Hua [2018] SGCA 44
The Court of Appeal clarified the doctrine of rectification, affirming that courts can correct written contracts to reflect common intention, even in complex commercial deals. The Court reinforced the need for clear and convincing evidence of a mutual mistake. This case is a leading authority on contract formation, interpretation, and equitable remedies, especially relevant in commercial law.

Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get fully prepared for SQE1 without breaking the bank. Access cost-effective SQE study manuals and 2000 practice questions developed by UOLLB, edited by lawyers, and published by UOL Press.

Turbocharge SQE Performance
UOL Case Bank

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain access to over 2,200 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is approved by UOL School of Law and is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Join students and legal professionals from Legal 500 firms, top universities and international organisations who trust UOLLB

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Ministry of Defence
Baker Mckenzie
Linklaters
Atsumi & Sakai
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Arizona State University
McGill University
Toronto Metropolitan University
University of Hong Kong (HKU)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
University of Buckingham
Robert Gordon University
ESSEC Business School
University of Puerto Rico

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Skills

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.