Top 10 Legal Doctrines for Law Students
Share
A legal doctrine refers to a set of principles or rules that form the foundation of legal reasoning and decision-making. It represents a body of established legal principles or beliefs that guide the interpretation, application, and development of the law. Legal doctrines are often derived from statutes, constitutional provisions, court decisions (precedents), and legal scholarship. Here are the top 10 doctrines you must know as a common law student:
Stare decisis: This doctrine, which means "to stand by things decided", emphasises the importance of precedent and the binding nature of court decisions on lower courts. It promotes consistency and predictability in the legal system.
Parliamentary supremacy: Also called parliamentary sovereignty or legislative supremacy, this doctrine grants the legislative body of a state, such as a parliament or congress, ultimate authority in making laws and exercising control over the other branches of government.
Presumption of innocence: The presumption of innocence is a doctrine that holds that an accused person is considered innocent until proven guilty. It places the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Double jeopardy: This doctrine protects individuals from being tried twice for the same offence after an acquittal or conviction. It prevents the government from subjecting individuals to multiple prosecutions for the same conduct.
Ultra vires: The doctrine of ultra vires applies to corporate law and states that a corporation is limited to exercising powers and acting within the scope of its authorised purpose as stated in its governing documents. Acts beyond this scope may be deemed void or unenforceable.
Privity: Privity is a doctrine that states that only parties to a legal issue have rights and obligations under the issue. It prevents third parties from enforcing or benefiting from the legal issue to which they are not a party.
Estoppel: Estoppel is a doctrine that prevents a party from going back on his promise and asserting his rights or changing his position if it would be unfair or inequitable to allow him to do so. It arises when one party relies on the words, conduct, or representations of another party to his detriment.
Clean hands: The clean hands doctrine prevents a party who has engaged in wrongful conduct from seeking equitable relief in court. It requires that a party seeking relief must have acted fairly and in good faith.
Respondeat superior: This doctrine holds employers or principals liable for the wrongful acts or omissions committed by their employees or agents within the scope of their employment or agency. It is often applied in cases of employer liability for employee actions.
Forum non conveniens: This doctrine allows a court to decline jurisdiction over a case if another court, with a closer connection to the dispute, is better suited to hear the case. It promotes efficiency and fairness in international or multi-jurisdictional cases.
These additional doctrines cover various legal concepts and principles from different areas of law. You will come across them at some point in your legal education. It is worth noting that these legal doctrines can vary in their application and interpretation based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
Stare decisis: This doctrine, which means "to stand by things decided", emphasises the importance of precedent and the binding nature of court decisions on lower courts. It promotes consistency and predictability in the legal system.
Parliamentary supremacy: Also called parliamentary sovereignty or legislative supremacy, this doctrine grants the legislative body of a state, such as a parliament or congress, ultimate authority in making laws and exercising control over the other branches of government.
Presumption of innocence: The presumption of innocence is a doctrine that holds that an accused person is considered innocent until proven guilty. It places the burden of proof on the prosecution to prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Double jeopardy: This doctrine protects individuals from being tried twice for the same offence after an acquittal or conviction. It prevents the government from subjecting individuals to multiple prosecutions for the same conduct.
Ultra vires: The doctrine of ultra vires applies to corporate law and states that a corporation is limited to exercising powers and acting within the scope of its authorised purpose as stated in its governing documents. Acts beyond this scope may be deemed void or unenforceable.
Privity: Privity is a doctrine that states that only parties to a legal issue have rights and obligations under the issue. It prevents third parties from enforcing or benefiting from the legal issue to which they are not a party.
Estoppel: Estoppel is a doctrine that prevents a party from going back on his promise and asserting his rights or changing his position if it would be unfair or inequitable to allow him to do so. It arises when one party relies on the words, conduct, or representations of another party to his detriment.
Clean hands: The clean hands doctrine prevents a party who has engaged in wrongful conduct from seeking equitable relief in court. It requires that a party seeking relief must have acted fairly and in good faith.
Respondeat superior: This doctrine holds employers or principals liable for the wrongful acts or omissions committed by their employees or agents within the scope of their employment or agency. It is often applied in cases of employer liability for employee actions.
Forum non conveniens: This doctrine allows a court to decline jurisdiction over a case if another court, with a closer connection to the dispute, is better suited to hear the case. It promotes efficiency and fairness in international or multi-jurisdictional cases.
These additional doctrines cover various legal concepts and principles from different areas of law. You will come across them at some point in your legal education. It is worth noting that these legal doctrines can vary in their application and interpretation based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
