Trust of Land vs Trust of Sale

The trust of land introduced by the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA) differs significantly from the statutory trust of sale under the Settled Land Act 1925 (SLA) in several key aspects. These differences revolve around the purposes of the trusts, the duties and powers of trustees, and the rights of beneficiaries. These shifts represent a modernisation in property law, reflecting changes in the way land ownership and co-ownership are managed and perceived.

Purpose and Nature of the Trust
Under the SLA, the primary focus of the statutory trust of sale was to ensure that land was treated as an asset to be sold. Trustees had a duty to sell the land and hold the proceeds on trust for the beneficiaries. This reflected the prevailing view at the time that land should be commodified, and ownership should be transformed into liquid assets to be distributed among the beneficiaries. The trust of sale was designed to facilitate the easy sale of land and transfer of its value to the beneficiaries, with little regard to maintaining the land itself.

Conversely, under the TOLATA, the concept of a trust of land was introduced to remove the automatic obligation to sell the land. Trustees under a trust of land are no longer required to sell the property unless it is in the beneficiaries' best interest. This change marked a shift from viewing land purely as a financial asset toward recognising land as a long-term resource that may be retained for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have more flexibility to either sell the land or retain it, depending on the circumstances, thus acknowledging the personal, practical, and emotional value of land, beyond its monetary worth.

Trustees' Powers and Duties
The SLA constrained trustees under the statutory trust of sale, obligating them to sell the property unless all beneficiaries agreed otherwise. Their primary duty was to ensure the conversion of land into financial proceeds for distribution. Trustees were limited in their ability to manage or retain the land unless specifically authorised by the terms of the trust or by the beneficiaries. The structure was rigid, with limited scope for discretion based on the needs of beneficiaries.

By contrast, The TOLATA grants trustees broader powers over the management and use of the land. They can now sell, lease, mortgage, or retain the land without the automatic obligation to sell. The TOLATA empowers trustees to make decisions based on what is most beneficial for the beneficiaries, reflecting modern property law's recognition of the diverse ways in which land can be held and used. This provides greater flexibility and enables trustees to respond to the specific circumstances surrounding the land and the interests of the beneficiaries.

Rights of Beneficiaries
Under the SLA, the rights of beneficiaries were primarily focused on their entitlement to the proceeds of a sale. Beneficiaries did not have a direct right to the land itself, and their interests were confined to receiving financial distributions once the land was sold. In practice, this meant that beneficiaries had limited say in how the land was managed or used prior to its sale.

The TOLATA significantly enhanced the rights of beneficiaries. Under a trust of land, beneficiaries are entitled to be consulted by trustees on decisions regarding the sale, retention, or management of the land. Although trustees have the final decision, they must consider the beneficiaries' wishes, particularly in residential contexts where land has personal value beyond its financial aspects. This empowerment of beneficiaries reflects a more inclusive and personal approach to co-ownership, where their preferences and interests are considered in decisions that affect the property.

Control over the Land
The SLA placed the ultimate control of the land in the hands of the trustees, with a strong emphasis on the sale of land to realise its value. Beneficiaries had little practical control over the property unless the trust explicitly granted them such powers. The law was focused on facilitating the easy conversion of land into financial assets.

In contrast, the TOLATA shifted the balance of control. While trustees still hold the legal title to the land, their powers are tempered by the beneficiaries’ rights to consultation. Trustees must now consider beneficiaries' views on whether the land should be sold or retained. Additionally, beneficiaries can apply to the court to prevent a sale if they feel it is not in their best interest. This shift reflects a more balanced approach, where land is not automatically treated as a disposable asset but rather a resource to be managed in accordance with the beneficiaries’ preferences and needs.

Flexibility and Modernisation
The introduction of the trust of land under the TOLATA brought much-needed flexibility to property law, recognising the evolving nature of land ownership and the various purposes it can serve. The statutory trust of sale under the SLA was rigid and outdated, designed for a time when land was primarily viewed as a commercial asset to be sold.

The TOLATA modernised the approach to land trusts, reflecting contemporary attitudes towards co-ownership, where land may serve as a home, an investment, or a shared family asset. Trustees under the TOLATA have the discretion to manage the land in a way that best serves the beneficiaries, whether through sale, retention, or use. This flexibility allows trustees to adapt to changing circumstances and to make decisions that reflect both the personal and financial interests of the beneficiaries.

In summary, the trust of land introduced by the TOLATA differs from the statutory trust of sale under the SLA in several crucial ways. The trust of land provides greater flexibility, shifting the focus from the automatic sale of land to its retention and management for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have broader powers under the TOLATA, and beneficiaries enjoy enhanced rights, including a say in decisions regarding the land. These changes reflect a modern approach to property law, recognising land as a resource with both personal and financial significance.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.