Unreasonableness vs Unconscionability

In the vast landscape of legal terminology, two terms frequently encountered, often interchangeably but with distinct implications, are unreasonableness and unconscionability. However their distinctions serve as vital safeguards against unfairness and injustice. While they both serve to evaluate the fairness and validity of contracts or actions within the realm of law, their applications and thresholds differ significantly.

Unreasonableness: A Measure of Rationality
Unreasonableness, as the term suggests, concerns itself with the rationality, fairness, and justifiability of actions or decisions within the legal framework. It is a standard applied to assess whether a particular term or clause in a contract conforms to fundamental principles of fairness, good faith, and public policy.

In contract law, an unreasonable clause may be one that egregiously favours one party over the other, deviates from customary industry standards, or imposes burdensome obligations disproportionate to the benefits conferred. Moreover, the circumstances surrounding the formation of the contract, including the relative bargaining power of the parties and any instances of coercion or deception, are pivotal considerations in determining unreasonableness.

For instance, a contract clause that requires a consumer to waive all legal rights without adequate notice or understanding could be deemed unreasonable. Similarly, terms that contravene established legal norms or public policy objectives, such as those promoting consumer protection or prohibiting discrimination, may be vulnerable to scrutiny for unreasonableness.

Unconscionability: Beyond Mere Unreasonableness
Unconscionability transcends mere unreasonableness, embodying a heightened standard of unfairness that shocks the conscience or violates notions of equity and justice. While unreasonableness focuses on the individual terms or clauses within a contract, unconscionability considers the broader context and circumstances surrounding its formation and enforcement.

A contract or clause may be deemed unconscionable if it exhibits a gross imbalance in bargaining power, exploits the vulnerability or ignorance of one party, or imposes oppressive terms that render the agreement fundamentally unfair. Unlike unreasonableness, which primarily assesses the substance of contractual provisions, unconscionability scrutinises the process by which the contract was negotiated and whether one party took undue advantage of the other's weaker position.

Courts tasked with evaluating unconscionability may examine factors such as the parties' respective sophistication and experience, the presence of unfair tactics or sharp dealing, and the extent to which the terms of the contract deviate from prevailing industry standards or societal norms. Contracts found to be unconscionable may be rendered void or unenforceable, or courts may opt to sever or modify the unconscionable provisions while upholding the remainder of the agreement.

In summary, while unreasonableness pertains to the fairness and rationality of individual contract terms, unconscionability encompasses a broader assessment of the contract's overall fairness and the circumstances surrounding its formation and enforcement. Both concepts play indispensable roles in upholding the principles of fairness, equity, and justice within the legal landscape.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.