Unregistered Land System

The Unregistered Land System (ULS) in English land law has been designed to enhance the alienability of land by ensuring the conclusiveness of rights and burdens. While the system aims for efficiency and certainty, there are notable criticisms, with some arguing that the primary flaw lies in the fifteen-year rule for inspecting title deeds. However, a critical examination reveals that the focus on conclusiveness may lead to more significant injustices within the system.

The ULS underwent significant modifications, including the reduction in the number of legal estates, the introduction of a land charge registration system, and the limited application of the doctrine of notice (DoN) to non-registrable equitable rights. Two forms of inspection, namely inspection of title deeds and physical inspection of land, are required under the ULS.

The inspection of title deeds involves the requirement for third parties to register their registrable equitable rights. However, the fifteen-year rule, outlined in Section 23 of the Law of Property Act (LPA) 1969, has been criticised as a defect. This rule allows purchasers to inspect only the titles of previous owners for the fifteen years preceding the most recent conveyance. The flaw lies in situations where registered equitable interests are undiscoverable, leading to potential injustice. Remedies are available, such as the ability to rescind purchase contracts or claim financial compensation, but the infrequent occurrence of this flaw and available remedies make it somewhat bearable.

Other issues related to the inspection of title deeds include the name-based land charge registration system, which is considered flawed. The reliance on names can lead to problems such as searching against incorrect names or registering land charges against the wrong names. These issues limit the protection offered to purchasers and third parties and contribute to the flaws within the ULS.

Furthermore, the ULS allows Section 4 of the Land Charges Act 1972 to be an instrument of equitable fraud. In certain situations where the third party is in actual occupation or the purchaser has actual knowledge not in good faith, unregistered registrable land charges may be void against bona fide purchasers. This strict adherence to simplified rules can result in unacceptable injustice.

The inspection of physical land under the ULS aims to eliminate reliance on DoN entirely. However, the residue category of rights remains governed by DoN, including equitable interests under a constructive trust and proprietary estoppel. The doctrine of constructive notice is not conclusive, and its standards for reasonable inspections have evolved over time. Flexibility in its application ensures justice and fairness, reacting to socio-economic changes and facilitating the transfer of land.

In conclusion, while the ULS has strong policy reasons for conclusiveness, if any measures within the system are to be considered flaws, they are those that displace flexibility and justice. The focus on conclusiveness, particularly in the inspection of title deeds, may lead to more significant injustices within the ULS. A balanced approach that considers both efficiency and fairness is essential to address the complexities and challenges inherent in the English land law system.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.