Van Gend en Loos [1963]

C-26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen [1963] is a landmark decision by the European Court of Justice that introduced the principle of direct effect within the framework of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community. This principle established that the provisions of the treaty could create legal rights enforceable by both individuals and legal entities before the courts of the Community's member states. Often regarded as one of the most crucial developments in European Union law, this case marked a significant step in empowering individuals to enforce their rights derived from EU law.

The case originated from a dispute between Van Gend en Loos, a postal and transportation company, and the Dutch Tax Authority regarding the reclassification of a chemical product, leading to increased customs charges. Van Gend en Loos argued that this reclassification violated Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome, which prohibited member states from introducing new customs duties or charges having equivalent effects between themselves.

Despite the Dutch Tariefcommissie's objections that Van Gend en Loos had no standing as a party to the treaty and that the tariff increase was de minimis, the European Court of Justice held that Article 12 conferred rights on individuals that could be enforced in national courts. The court rejected the advocate general's opinion that Article 12 did not have direct effect.

The judgment affirmed that Article 12 could create personal rights for Van Gend en Loos, and the Netherlands could not impose a higher tariff than that in force on January 1, 1958, the date when the treaty came into effect. The court asserted that the Community constituted a new legal order with its own set of rules, binding both member states and their nationals. The case emphasised that EU law not only imposed obligations on individuals but also conferred rights upon them.

The court's decision hinged on the clear and unconditional nature of Article 12, constituting a negative obligation that did not require additional national legislative measures for its implementation. This clarity made the provision ideally suited for direct effects in the legal relationship between member states and their subjects.

The significance of the case lies in establishing the concept of direct effect, wherein sufficiently clear and unconditional provisions of the Treaty of Rome could be directly applied against member states. This innovative jurisprudence by the European Court of Justice emphasised the autonomous nature of the EU legal order and its necessity to ensure member states' compliance with treaty obligations.

Moreover, the case demonstrated a procedural innovation in enforcing EU law at the national level, as direct effect did not necessitate the commission to bring an action against the state. This decentralised enforcement mechanism provided individuals with an effective means to protect their rights derived from EU law.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.