Vercoe v Rutland Fund Management Ltd [2010]

Vercoe v Rutland Fund Management Ltd [2010] EWHC 424 (Ch) addressed the issue of remedies for breach of a confidentiality agreement, highlighting the general principle that an account of profits is not the usual remedy unless there is an exceptional case, such as a fiduciary relationship extending beyond the normal commercial context.

The facts of the case involved the claimants seeking to orchestrate a management buy-in of a company with the support of outside investors. The business plan envisioned claimants assuming management roles. However, the defendant, who eventually acquired the company, did not involve claimants as agreed in the confidentiality agreement, and subsequently made substantial profits from the transaction. claimants brought a claim for breach of confidence.

The court held in favour of claimants, finding that the defendant had breached the confidentiality agreement by not involving claimants in the transaction as agreed. The issue then turned to the appropriate remedy. The court emphasised that, in cases of breach, a reasonable buy-out fee is the standard remedy to be offered unless there are exceptional circumstances warranting an account of profits.

Sales J, delivering the judgment, discussed the choice between multiple remedies. He noted that in cases where the claimant's rights are particularly powerful and their interest in full performance is strong, there may be a tendency to allow the claimant a choice of remedy, including between damages and an account of profits.

The judgment outlined the considerations for choosing between remedies. In cases involving infringement of property rights, damages assessed by reference to a notional buy-out fee may often represent an appropriate and fair remedy. On the other hand, an account of profits may be more appropriate when the right in question is of a kind where it would never be reasonable to expect it could be bought out for a reasonable fee.

In the specific context of the case, the court ruled that the extent of the defendant's liability was not measured by the profits made but by the reasonable price to buy release from claimants' rights. The appropriate remedy was damages assessed by reference to a reasonable buy-out fee, which, in this case, was tied to the probable equity allocation claimants would have obtained to buy them out of the deal.

In conclusion, this case clarifies the principles governing the choice of remedies in cases of breach of confidentiality agreements, emphasising the standard nature of a reasonable buy-out fee as a remedy, unless exceptional circumstances warrant an account of profits.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.