W v Essex County Council [2001]

W v Essex County Council [2001] 2 AC 592 is a legal case that explored the concept of primary and secondary victims in the context of psychiatric injury resulting from negligence. The case involved involuntary participants placed in a situation by the defendant's negligence, leading them to unwittingly contribute to an accident and suffer psychiatric injury, in this instance, from feelings of guilt.

The factual background of the case centred on the claimants agreeing to take in a 15-year-old foster child with a history of sexual abuse. The decision was based on a misrepresentation by a social worker working under Essex County Council that the child was not a sex abuser. Subsequently, the foster child abused claimants' young children, causing the claimants to suffer psychiatric injury.

Initially, the trial judge struck out the claimants' claim, arguing that their psychiatric injury was too remote. However, the claimants appealed, and the House of Lords allowed the appeal, stating that the claim should not have been struck out.

Lord Slynn of Hadley, delivering the judgment, emphasised the flexibility and development of the law in this area, even with the limitations established in the precedent case Alcock. He noted that the categories of primary and secondary victims were not closed, indicating that the law could evolve incrementally.

Lord Slynn considered the possibility of the claimants making a claim as primary victims, even though there was no physical danger to them. He argued that the defendant's negligence, leading the claimants to unwittingly contribute to their children's abuse, could create sufficient proximity for a claim.

Additionally, Lord Slynn explored the possibility of the claimants making a claim as secondary victims. He acknowledged that the concept of the immediate aftermath of the incident needed to be assessed in the specific factual situation. Despite a 4-week gap between the children's abuse and the claimants finding out, he suggested that there could still be sufficient spatial and temporal proximity for a claim to be made out.

In summary, W v Essex County Council illustrates the court's willingness to adapt and develop legal principles surrounding psychiatric injury claims, particularly in cases where individuals are involuntary participants due to the defendant's negligence. The judgment emphasises the potential for claims as both primary and secondary victims, even in situations where traditional categories might not neatly apply.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.