Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961]

Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd [1961] UKPC 2, commonly referred to as Wagon Mound (No 1), holds significance as a landmark tort law case that established a crucial rule for causation in negligence. This legal dispute emerged from an incident involving Overseas Tankship's ship, the Wagon Mound, which leaked furnace oil into Sydney Harbour. The ensuing events led to substantial fire damage to a wharf owned by Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, sparking a legal battle over liability and foreseeability.

In October 1951, Overseas Tankship's vessel leaked furnace oil, also known as Bunker oil, into Sydney Harbour. The oil drifted beneath a wharf owned by Morts Dock, where welding activities were underway. The combination of the oil and hot metal from welding resulted in a fire that caused extensive damage to the wharf and nearby ships. The legal action brought by Morts Dock sought damages for negligence, prompting a consideration of foreseeability and liability.

The central legal question revolved around whether Overseas Tankship could be held liable for the damages caused by the fire. The Privy Council's judgment in favour of Overseas Tankship hinged on the determination that the damage from the fire was not reasonably foreseeable. The court rejected the precedent set by Re Polemis, which had established a broader liability for all consequences flowing from negligent conduct, regardless of foreseeability. The Privy Council emphasised the importance of foreseeability as the logical link between a breach of duty and resulting damages.

The court disapproved of the rule set by Re Polemis and underscored the significance of foreseeability in assessing negligence. Liability was deemed applicable only for damage that was reasonably foreseeable, aligning with the principle that a person is responsible for the probable consequences of their actions. The judgment highlighted the impracticality of holding individuals liable for unforeseeable damage and asserted that civil liability is founded on the foreseeability of consequences rather than the directness of the chain of events.

Wagon Mound (No 1) marked a notable departure from the precedent set by Re Polemis, contributing to the evolution of negligence principles. The case emphasised the importance of foreseeability and probable consequences, shaping subsequent legal developments in the law of negligence. The ruling clarified the criteria for establishing liability, establishing a lasting impact on tort law jurisprudence.

It is essential to distinguish Wagon Mound (No 1) from Wagon Mound (No 2), which addressed the standard of the reasonable person in breach of the duty of care, further contributing to the nuanced landscape of negligence law.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.