Wagon Mound (No 2) [1967]

Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co [1967] 1 AC 617, commonly referred to as the Wagon Mound (No 2), is a landmark decision in English tort law, particularly in the areas of negligence and nuisance. This case revolves around the principle that, in nuisance, the injury must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable in damages, extending beyond occupier cases. This necessitates a balance between the difficulty and financial cost of preventive measures and the magnitude of the risk, applicable to both negligence and nuisance in occupier cases.

The defendants moored at Mort’s dock. Oil leaked from the vessel, and despite this spillage, the defendants' employees failed to address it. Subsequently, when the oil caught fire, the claimants' vessels under repair at Mort’s Dock suffered damage. Initially, the trial judge held that the damage was not reasonably foreseeable, deeming the risk of oil alighting on water as remote.

The Privy Council, however, held that the defendants were liable in nuisance to pay damages to the claimants. It was determined that a reasonable person in the position of the defendants' chief engineer should have been aware of the risk of the oil alighting, and the injury was, therefore, reasonably foreseeable.

Lord Reid emphasised the importance of foreseeability in nuisance, asserting that while generally, nuisance does not require fault or negligence, in certain cases, like Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940], fault and foreseeability are prerequisites. Discrimination based on whether foreseeability is required in different nuisance cases was considered unjustifiable. Therefore, the injury suffered must be foreseeable for liability to be established.

Regarding the standard of care, the case draws on the precedent of Bolton v Stone [1951], emphasising that neglecting a risk, no matter how small, is justifiable only if there is a valid reason, such as considerable expense to eliminate the risk. In the current case, the Chief Engineer's knowledge of the oil spillage and the foreseeable risk of ignition on water rendered neglecting the risk unreasonable.

Furthermore, the case underscores that despite the requirement of reasonable foreseeability, nuisance remains a strict liability tort. Even if the defendant took reasonable care to prevent interference with the claimant's enjoyment of land, liability can still be established if the interference is deemed an "unreasonable user". The reasonable user test shifts the focus to whether the interference is one that the claimant should reasonably be expected to tolerate.

A comparison with Bolton v Stone highlights the minute risk in both cases but distinguishes them based on the legality and social utility of the defendant's actions. Unlike the cricket club in Bolton v Stone, which carried out a lawful and socially useful activity, the defendants in Wagon Mound (No 2) acted illegally by permitting the oil spillage. The different outcome from Wagon Mound (No 1) is attributed to the trial judge's finding that the defendants' employees should have known of the risk in the current case.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance Here

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.