Warren v Mendy [1989]

Warren v Mendy [1989] 1 WLR 853 is an English contract law case that dealt with the issue of granting an injunction in the context of a personal service contract.

Warren, the claimant, had entered into a contract with the boxer, whereby Warren was to act as the boxer's exclusive manager and promoter. However, in breach of this contract, the boxer entered into an agreement with another promoter, Mendy. Seeking to prevent Mendy from inducing the boxer to breach his contract, Warren sought an injunction.

In the judgment delivered by Nourse LJ in the Court of Appeal, Lumley v Wagner [1852] was distinguished. The key distinction highlighted was the duration of the contract period. In Lumley v Wagner, the court granted an injunction when there were only two months left in the three-month contract, limiting the time Wagner had to remain idle. General principles were then laid down regarding the court's approach to personal service contracts.

The court stated that it should not enforce the performance of negative obligations in a contract for personal services, especially those inseparable from the exercise of special skill or talent, if the injunction would effectively compel the servant to perform positive obligations. The likelihood of compulsion was to be considered based on factors such as the servant's physical, psychological, and material needs, the term of the injunction, and the presence of mutual obligations of trust and confidence.

Applying these principles to the present case, the court found that the factors against granting an injunction were met. Boxing was deemed a highly specialist trade with a short professional life for the boxer. The suggestion that the boxer could find alternative work was rejected due to his acquired specialist skills. The high degree of trust and confidence required between the boxer and manager had eroded, and it was likely that Warren would seek an injunction against any other manager the boxer approached.

It is worth noting that the result depends on the nature of the personal service contract involved. In cases where the work is highly specialist, limiting the servant's ability to engage in alternative lines of work, an injunction may be more likely. Conversely, in contracts for less specialist work, the expectation may be that the servant can reasonably find alternative employment.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.