What Is Remoteness?

Remoteness, also known as the doctrine of remoteness of damage, is a legal principle used in Tort Law to determine whether a defendant is liable for the harm or damage suffered by the plaintiff. It focuses on the extent to which the harm caused by the defendant's actions or omissions was reasonably foreseeable. The doctrine of remoteness serves as a limitation on liability to prevent defendants from being held responsible for unforeseeable or too-remote consequences.

Foreseeability: The principle of remoteness revolves around the concept of foreseeability. For a defendant to be held liable, the harm suffered by the plaintiff must be reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendant's wrongful act or negligence. The defendant is not responsible for damages that could not have been reasonably anticipated.

Reasonable person standard: The foreseeability is assessed based on what a reasonable person, with knowledge of the circumstances at the time, would have foreseen as potential consequences of their actions or omissions. It is an objective standard that takes into account the general knowledge, experience, and understanding of a reasonable person in similar circumstances.

Directness of causation: Remoteness also considers the directness or proximity of the causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. The harm must not be too remote or disconnected from the defendant's actions. There should be a sufficiently close relationship between the wrongful act and the injury.

Type of harm: The type of harm or damage suffered by the plaintiff is relevant to the application of remoteness. The harm must be of a kind that was reasonably foreseeable, although the specific extent or magnitude of the harm need not have been predicted. If the harm is too unusual or extraordinary, it may be considered too remote to be within the scope of the defendant's liability.

Thin skull rule: The thin skull rule is an exception to the doctrine of remoteness. It states that a defendant is liable for the full extent of harm caused, even if the particular vulnerability or sensitivity of the plaintiff to the harm was not reasonably foreseeable. In other words, the defendant takes the plaintiff as they find them, with all their pre-existing conditions or vulnerabilities.

Novus actus interveniens: Novus actus interveniens refers to a new intervening act or event that occurs after the defendant's wrongful act or negligence and contributes to the plaintiff's harm. If the intervening act is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct, it does not break the chain of causation, and the defendant remains liable. However, if the intervening act is unforeseeable and operates as a new and independent cause of the harm, it may break the chain of causation and limit the defendant's liability.

The application of remoteness can be complex and dependent on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Courts consider various factors, including foreseeability, directness of causation, type of harm, and policy considerations, when determining whether the harm is too remote to hold the defendant liable.
Back to blog

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding. Speed up your revision with us now.

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Yale University
Council of Europe
Baker Mckenzie 
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law


    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory


    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.