Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017]

Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24 is an important case where the Supreme Court re-evaluated the principles governing contractual interpretation, examining how courts should balance the literal meaning of a clause (textualism) with the broader commercial context in which it was created (contextualism). This case drew upon two previous Supreme Court decisions, Arnold v Britton & ors [2015], where textualism was prioritised, and Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011], which favoured a commercially reasonable interpretation for ambiguous contractual language.

The dispute in Wood v Capita revolved around an indemnity clause in a sale and purchase agreement for an insurance broker. Capita, the purchaser, bought a car insurance business and was indemnified by the seller against "losses derived from the mis-selling or suspected mis-selling of insurance products prior to the sale" or warranty claims made within two years. After the sale, Capita identified that the company might have mis-sold insurance products to customers. Upon informing the Financial Services Authority (FSA), Capita was required to establish a remediation scheme, which led to a financial loss of approximately £1.35 million. Capita sought to recover this loss under the indemnity clause, arguing that the mis-selling losses fell within its terms.

The sellers contended that the indemnity clause did not apply because there were no actual complaints or claims against the company; rather, the loss arose from Capita's voluntary self-reporting to the FSA. According to the sellers, this self-reporting was outside the intended scope of the indemnity.

The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of the sellers, endorsing a narrow interpretation of the indemnity clause. In reaching this conclusion, the Court examined both the language and the commercial context. It acknowledged that Capita, as the purchaser, would have had a legitimate interest in broad indemnification, while the sellers would naturally seek a more limited scope. However, the precise wording of the contract pointed to a narrow interpretation, aligning with the sellers' position.

The Supreme Court's decision clarified that textualism and contextualism should not be viewed as mutually exclusive approaches but rather as complementary tools in the interpretive process. It emphasised that courts should neither ignore the natural language of the contract nor disregard the commercial rationale behind it. Instead, a balanced approach should be taken, recognising that contractual interpretation is a unified procedure that involves considering both the literal terms and the context in which they were agreed upon.

This judgment confirmed that Arnold v Britton and Rainy Sky represent different facets of a cohesive interpretative approach, each applicable depending on the specific circumstances of the case. By striking this balance, the Court reaffirmed the flexibility and precision needed to ensure that contractual terms are interpreted in a manner that respects both the parties' words and their broader intentions.
Back to blog
UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

UOLLB SQE Turbocharge

Get ready for the SQE1 with high-performance SQE Study Guides developed by UOLLB and published by UOL Press to revolutionise your study method and exam strategy.

Turbocharge SQE Performance

UOL Case Bank

Upon joining, you become a valuable UOL student and gain instant access to over 2,100 essential case summaries. UOL Case Bank is constantly expanding.
Speed up your revision with us now👇

Subscribe Now

Where are our students from?

Council of Europe
Crown Prosecution Service
Baker Mckenzie 
Yale University
University of Chicago
Columbia University
New York University
University of Michigan 
INSEAD
University of London
University College London (UCL)
London School of Economics (LSE)
King’s College London (KCL)
Royal Holloway, University of London 
Birkbeck, University of London
SOAS, University of London
University of Manchester
University of Zurich
University of York
Brandeis University
University of Exeter
University of Sheffield
Boston University
University of Washington
University of Leeds
University of Law
University of Kent
University of Hull
Queen’s University Belfast
Toronto Metropolitan University
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Buckingham
ESSEC Business School

  • Criminal Practice

    Diagrams and Charts

    Our carefully designed diagrams and charts will guide you through complex legal issues.

  • Criminal Law

    Clear and Succinct Definitions

    Key concepts are concisely defined to help you understand legal topics quickly.

  • Property Law

    Statutory Provisions

    Statutory provisions are provided side by side with legal concepts to help you swiftly locate the relevant legislation.

  • Public Law

    Case Summaries

    We have summarised important cases for you so that you don't need to read long and boring cases.

  • Evidence

    Rules and Exceptions

    Rules and exceptions are clearly listed so that you know when a rule applies and when it doesn't.

  • Company Law

    Terminology

    Legal terms and key concepts are explained at the beginning of each chapter to help you learn efficiently.

  • Case Law

    Case law is provided side by side with legal concepts so that you know how legal principles and precedents were established.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Law Essay Guide

    You will learn essential law exam skills and essay writing techniques that are not taught in class.

  • Law Exam Guide

    Problem Question Guide

    We will show you how to answer problem questions step by step to achieve first-class results.

  • Conflict of Laws

    Structured Explanations

    Complex legal concepts are broken down into concise and digestible bullet point explanations.

  • Legal System and Method

    Legal Research

    You will learn legal research techniques with our study guide and become a proficient legal researcher.

  • Jurisprudence and Legal Theory

    Exam-focused

    All essential concepts, principles, and case law are included so that you can answer exam questions quickly.